--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-07 02:05 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-03-31 02:13 EDT---
Tested on focal.
---
dpkg -l | grep s390-tools
ii s390-tools 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3
s390xfundamental utilities for Linux on z Systems
ii s390-tools-signed
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-29 08:04 EDT---
Looks like an updated version of "s390-tools-signed" with the same version
number than the normal s390-tools is needed for verification.
# sudo apt-get install s390-tools/focal-proposed
Reading package lists... Done
Bu
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-03 03:55 EDT---
Tested the latest ubuntu21.04
root@m35lp41:~# cat /proc/version
Linux version 5.10.0-14-generic (buildd@bos02-s390x-005) (gcc (Ubuntu
10.2.1-6ubuntu2) 10.2.1 20210121, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.36)
#15-Ubuntu
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-01 09:15 EDT---
@Can, when can we expect the integration of the fix ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
Title:
[UBU
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-01-25 07:44 EDT---
The patch mentioned in comment#39 is available in the s390-tools upstream now.
https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/commit/7dd03eaeecdd0e2674f145aca34be1275d291bd8
--
You received this bug notification because you a
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-20 09:02 EDT---
Upstream patch will be pushed soon to the next upcoming s390-tools...
-> in progresss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2020-12-10 08:39 EDT---
Unfortunately .defval="1" functionality doesnt work for this case.
Instead, what we do is, we modify the root_check() function in root.c,such a
way that, the required functionality of zdev:early=1 is enabled by default,
base