Thanks Marco, I'll take pam-pkcs11 off our todo list. (This can be
reversed, of course. If it turns out to be necessary for something,
someone shout. :)
Thanks
** Changed in: pam-pkcs11 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: pam-pkcs11 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team
Hi,
Related to the desktop team specific needs, I wanted to mention that at
the current state we don't expect to need or support pam-pkcs11 given
that we want to rely only on pam-sss (that should be at this time more
than enough for any need), other than being already in main.
So, while in debian
Hi Seth and Joy,
I see you cleared the list a lot - awesome!
You have subscribed and pinged the remaining ones which is a reasonable
approach as most might be no more real issues as of today.
I'm ok for the Ubuntu side of the pcsc-lite bugs now, what still needs
to be addressed is https://bugs.de
Christian, Joy has gone through the bugs and either closed old ones or
made some progress on still-relevant ones. How does it look to you now?
Thanks Joy!
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
ubuntu-security is now subscribed to pcsc-lite bugs.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559
Title:
[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite
To manage
## pcsc-lite ##
[Summary]
Mir Team ACK under the condition that the required TODOs are resolved.
While the owning Team should look at that security can already start
a review.
This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security
list specific binary packages to be promoted to main: p
Sorry, I forgot to update one section for pcsc-lite on packaging:
- important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
There are quite some:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bugs?field.searchtext=crash&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_W
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559
Title:
[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libp
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559
Title:
[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite
To m
pcsc-lite source package provides pcscd and libpcsclite1 and thus is
needed for smartcard deployment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559
Title:
[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-per
pcscd is required. When removed, I am not able to get any info from the
driver about the reader or the smartcard. pcscd loads the smartcard
driver and coordinates communications.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Hi Seth and Christian,
I did a smartcard setup and confirmed I did not have to use anything
from pcsc-tools. And pcsc-tools seem to depend on libpcsc-perl, so won't
need pcsc-perl either.
My "sudo apt install opensc" pulled in libccid, libpcslite1, opensc-
pkcs11 and pcscd binary packages. I only
assigning pcsc-lite back to sarnold for the decision if you really
need/want it for "pcscd" or not.
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Arnold (seth-arnold)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
While looking at pcsc-tools and pcscs-perl (only needed for the
dependency from pcscs-tools) I have found that these are not really
depended on by anything important.
This matches the statement in the request that says:
"This package provides general utilities for smartcards; it's possible that we
I asked about it in comment #2 already.
pcsc-lite was MIRed in bug 250245 but pcscd explcitly excluded.
One either needs to:
1. step up and say "yes we want to own it" (in that case please add a request
to the description)
2. say this isn't needed for what you want to achieve (Essentially providin
[Summary]
This looks mostly ok from a MIR POV, I've listed remaining that would
help to get this improved below. Those are rather minor, MIR Ack under the
condition to have them handled. Please update the bug once you have done so.
Specific binary packages to be promoted to main: libpam-pkcs11
Re
[Summary]
This package needs some cleanup for better tests, symbols tracking and things
like lintian/dh_missing. No show stoppers thou, MIR Team kind-of-Ack under the
condition to try to improve these weak spots before promotion.
Please report here what has been done for that and summarize the new
[Summary]
>From the MIR POV the package is mostly ok. The overall topic of smartcard
usage will need some QA testing to be supportable. Only a bit can be done
in autopkgtest due to the special HW requirements but it would be worth to
try that as well as setting up a test lab with the most common re
Done, thanks Christian!
** Description changed:
==> ccid <==
[Availability]
ccid is in universe, and builds on all architectures.
[Rationale]
The desktop team and security team are interested in bringing smartcard
authentication to enterprise desktop environments.
[Security]
The MIR bug 250245 for libpcsclite1 was a bit trivial back then, I think
since this now requires also pcscd for the recommends from opensc we
should add it to this overall MIR to re-process it under todays terms.
@sarnold - would you mind doing the initial checks for pcsc-lite as well
and add them
** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
** Changed in: pam-pkcs11 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
** Changed in:
I am happy to see interest in smart cards from Ubuntu. if you need help
you can contact me.
I like your comment: "Does require odd hardware that we'll probably need to
buy."
If you want to support smart cards then, yes, you will have to buy some smart
cards and smart card readers :-)
--
You re
22 matches
Mail list logo