The DNSmasq change is in impish as well.
Since we (intentionally) referenced but not closed the bug by the upload I'll
have to tag that manually.
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.30.0-1ubuntu4
---
network-manager (1.30.0-1ubuntu4) impish; urgency=medium
* d/t/nm.py: adapt to changes dnsmasq behavior (LP: #1894619)
-- Christian Ehrhardt Fri, 02 Jul
2021 11:13:46 +0200
** Changed in: network-manager
dnsmasq tested all fine with the new NM.
Only the odd systemd blocker holds us back now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have
The new NM tests were fine (even against the old dnsmasq due to the or in the
regex).
NM hit a few non related systemd test issues - I re-triggered those.
Finally I did now start the new NM tests against the blocked dnsmasq.
Overall that should hopefully resolve both and let them migrate.
--
Ok, as planned I can reproduce this in local autopkgtest.
Multiple hits on:
AssertionError: Regex didn't match: 'inet6 2600::[0-9a-f:]+/64 scope global
(?:tentative )?(?:mngtmpaddr )?(?:noprefixroute )?dynamic' not found in '14:
eth42@veth42: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
group default qlen
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+git/network-manager/+merge/405081
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
As expected this is now ready in proposed and blocked on the NM test, example:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/n/network-manager/20210701_151447_a29ef@/log.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I have not found any other test issues than the expected NM one.
So I'm uploading since - to some extend - we want to see if anything else
breaks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
According to the discussion dnsmasq will revert to the upstream intended
behavior.
I added an open impish task to reflect that.
At the same time this makes network-mamager expose the test issue we initially
found it with.
An example can already be seen in
PPA:
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by
Yeah I'm also not entirely sure.
But I'm assuming that the maintainers insight into all the interactions is
better than mine and therefore tend to follow.
About the "why the difference DHCPv6 vs SLAAC" I think that is fine
because the code now allows to behave different (reasonable). And the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:53:41AM -, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> We finally got an answer to our questions/pings (thanks Simon)
> =>
> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015134.html
>
> TL;DR: this might be wanted new behavior :/ ?!
>
> @Laney - You
We finally got an answer to our questions/pings (thanks Simon)
=> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015134.html
TL;DR: this might be wanted new behavior :/ ?!
@Laney - You initially started this when we have faced this bug
I wonder now if we should indeed drop our
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #989378
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989378
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989378
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
This bug was fixed in the package dnsmasq - 2.82-1ubuntu1
---
dnsmasq (2.82-1ubuntu1) groovy; urgency=medium
* src/radv.c: avoid leases to be issued forever when not set (LP:
#1894619)
-- Christian Ehrhardt Wed, 16 Sep
2020 14:26:58 +0200
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
The tests confirmed the issue that Iain reported and that the fix works.
Also no other issues popped up in the NM test using it.
autopkgtest [08:47:12]: summary
wpa-dhclient PASS
nm.pyPASS
killswitches-no-urfkill PASS
urfkill-integration PASS
And
FYI: builds complete - Running the test builds of network-
manager_1.26.2-1ubuntu1.dsc in groovy against the proposed and the PPA
version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
BTW I randomly picked the latter patch of the two as no one seems to
have jumped on the first one and said "yes let us apply it".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82
Ok changed MP and PPA to work for 1.0 source
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by
default
To manage
Arrr 1.0 source, need to apply differently
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by
default
To manage
The patch suggested at
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q3/014346.html
isn't applied yet.
I guess this waits for feedback if it worked before they apply it.
To get this going here a PPA and an associated MP:
PPA:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+git/dnsmasq/+merge/390832
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression]
I think either of the patches is probably fine, no idea what any
upstream reviewer will prefer.
I guess it would be good to upload one of them sooner rather than later
though, to (1) unbreak dnsmasq, (2) unblock network-manager.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks for filing this bug Iain.
I am tagging it as server-next and it should be worked on by our team
soon. As a source of information for the person who will work on it here
is the patch submitted by Iain:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-
discuss/2020q3/014345.html
And in the
I proposed a patch on the thread, waiting for feedback.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619
Title:
[2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by
default
To
26 matches
Mail list logo
