--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:44 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested Distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 13:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #92)
> (In reply to comment #86)
> > Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic?
>
> I will try to get the Xenial verification done too before the end of day.
>
I've just verified Xenial. Surprise,
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-04 07:54 EDT---
(In reply to comment #86)
> Thanks, could you please also test Xenial and Bionic?
I've just verified bionic. The results are pretty much the same as the
results with the ppa version I tested before.
I will try to get the Xenial
--- Comment From andre.wi...@ibm.com 2020-11-03 06:04 EDT---
I was also not able to reproduce this with the latest updates from the
focal-proposed repository.
Both guests I set up had also used the qemu driver.
libvirt version: 6.0.0
package: 0ubuntu8.4
qemu version:
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-14 21:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #72)
> > Checking SRU compatibility:
> >
> > #1 Source
> > Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> > Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> > Xenial: some more nois
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-13 12:41 EDT---
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #72)
> > Checking SRU compatibility:
> >
> > #1 Source
> > Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> > Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> > Xenial: some more nois
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 21:16 EDT---
(In reply to comment #72)
> Checking SRU compatibility:
>
> #1 Source
> Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> Xenial: some more nois (tracepoint missing), but still ok
>
>
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-09-09 09:44 EDT---
(In reply to comment #67)
> Thanks for the quick answer!
> Any particular uperf profile that was found to be more likely/reliably to
> trigger it?
> I assume with driver=qemu you actually mean something like:
>
>
>
> Which is
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2020-09-09 02:50 EDT---
> Hi,
> the patches LGTM and I'll make it part of the Ubuntu builds.
>
> One question thou: on one hand "occasionally end up with" sounds like this
> is almost impossible to explicitly test, but then the attached debug patch
>
