[Bug 1895817] Re: [FFe] Dual-signed shim

2020-10-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
FTR: NSA says[1] that most UEFI implementations only support one hash, which might be the first one or a random one, and upstream confirms that to some extent - PE 8.3 not having a coherent spec for alignment or padding of signatures, causing incompatibilites - so that seems like a no-go anyway.

[Bug 1895817] Re: [FFe] Dual-signed shim

2020-09-16 Thread Steve Langasek
Because there is concrete risk of regression that depends on hardware- specific testing, I do not think this is appropriate for an FFe. The dual-signed object is available and particular system configurations can manually opt into it but we should not, during feature freeze, push this out to all