[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2021-03-23 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
** Changed in: ubuntu-image Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896744 Title: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-image - 1.10+18.04ubuntu1 --- ubuntu-image (1.10+18.04ubuntu1) bionic; urgency=medium [ Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak ] * SRU tracking number LP: #1896744 * Add a quick option to disable console-conf. (LP:1866002) * Disable some of the unsu

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-image - 1.10+20.04ubuntu1 --- ubuntu-image (1.10+20.04ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium [ Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak ] * SRU tracking number LP: #1896744 * Add a quick option to disable console-conf. (LP:1866002) * Disable some of the unsup

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-image - 1.10+16.04ubuntu1 --- ubuntu-image (1.10+16.04ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium [ Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak ] * SRU tracking number LP: #1896744 * Add a quick option to disable console-conf. (LP:1866002) * Disable some of the unsu

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-05 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
On a xenial multipass instance I was able to build successful UC16, UC18 and classic images using ubuntu-image from xenial-proposed (1.10+16.04ubuntu1). Looks good here! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial -- Y

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-05 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I set up a bionic multipass instance and was able to build a successful UC18, UC20 and classic image using ubuntu-image from bionic-proposed (1.10+18.04ubuntu1). I did a quick boot test of the UC18 one and everything worked as expected (the rest follow the same code paths, direct backports). ** Ta

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-10-05 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I was able to successfully build and boot both UC18 and classic images using ubuntu-image 1.10+20.04ubuntu1 on a focal machine. Both images booted fine. Since focal is used for building UC20 images, I have also successfully built one for the amd64 model and sent it over to certification for testi

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-09-24 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Łukasz, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-image into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- image/1.10+20.04ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-09-24 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Thank you Laney! The package migrated so tomorrow during the regular daily builds well see if we regressed ubuntu-cpc (raspi server) or not ;) ** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-09-24 Thread Iain Lane
OK, I understand that the impact is limited for groovy since we don't build most of the relevant images there. Feel free to go ahead then, but please do make sure that the ubuntu-cpc images continue to work. ** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received thi

[Bug 1896744] Re: [FFe] SRU 1.10 tracking bug

2020-09-23 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Here's a build log from my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~sil2100/+archive/ubuntu/testing/+sourcepub/11592196 /+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896744 Title: [FFe]