On Feb 9, 2008 11:26 AM, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a COMPLETELY different problem. You didn't select a > FONT that
> provides this characters.
Understood. The report is invalid then.
All I can say in my defense is that I've been searching all over the
Internet and th
On Sa, 09 Feb 2008, Thomas Folz-Donahue wrote:
> > Yeah, after looking more carefully I think I see what the report wanted
> > to do -- use the unicode character ?? instead of \rho in LaTeX math mode.
> > Well, it won't surprise me it didn't work.
>
> Look more carefully. That ?? was outside any
On Feb 9, 2008 4:50 AM, Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, after looking more carefully I think I see what the report wanted
> to do -- use the unicode character ρ instead of \rho in LaTeX math mode.
> Well, it won't surprise me it didn't work.
Look more carefully. That ρ was outside any
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:43:58PM -, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> Aehm ... what did you expect with this document???
>
> TeX Math fonts are NOT NOT NOT set up for usage with unicode.
> That is a fact. Forget anything in that document.
> UTF is supported in text mode for many characters but fa
On Fr, 08 Feb 2008, Thomas Folz-Donahue wrote:
> Here it is.
Aehm ... what did you expect with this document???
TeX Math fonts are NOT NOT NOT set up for usage with unicode.
That is a fact. Forget anything in that document.
UTF is supported in text mode for many characters but far from all.
I gu
