** Changed in: gcc-10 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: gcc-10 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: a7xpg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dub (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dustmite (Ubuntu)
I also confirm that the autopkgtest for the new version of dub, the only
package with tests, passes.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dub/focal/amd64
etc...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
checked the dub package and one of the games, that these are working.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901080
Title:
libgphobos1: ABI breakage in SRU
To manage notifications about
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted titanion into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/titanion/0.3.dfsg1-7build3.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted a7xpg into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/a7xpg/0.11.dfsg1-10build3.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
- do the no-change rebuilds
- then re-upload gcc-10 with the added breaks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901080
Title:
libgphobos1: ABI breakage in SRU
To manage notifications
So how should we proceed now? I see a set of no-change rebuilds from
Matthias in the queue, but if we'd go with the second solution Steve
mentioned, those will have to be rebuilt once again, right? I like the
idea of us handling out-of-archive binaries, but I also don't know what
the general
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:22:52PM -, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Regression potential: low, no-change rebuilds with the updated GCC
> 10.3.
> Won't this break any users who have built their own binaries against
> libgphobos1?
Yes, it will.
A proper fix for this must include upgrade handling.
> Regression potential: low, no-change rebuilds with the updated GCC
10.3.
Won't this break any users who have built their own binaries against
libgphobos1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
- gcc-10 was SRUed to focal, and in the process introduced regressions
- caused by ABI breakage of libgphobos1.
+ gcc-10 was a shipped as a pre-release version in focal, which saw an ABI
+ change in libgphobos with the GCC 10.2 release. Now instead of
+ reverting this
** Also affects: dub (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: a7xpg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: val-and-rick (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu)
Importance:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gcc-10 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901080
Title:
lowering exaggerated severity. No, ABI stability was not impacted
besides for libphobos.
** Changed in: gcc-10 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
13 matches
Mail list logo
