Confirm - things get even worser with Ubuntu 8.10. Using the rt2500pci
driver and NetworkManager my WLAN-Router started to hang after some
ammount of traffic (just using aptitude update was enougt). Had to
reboot the router to be able to connect again.
Just after compiling the rt2500 from
For the record I'd like to add a me too
I have an rt2500, worked well in the past (old driver)
It was unusably slow in hardy but could be forced to full speed with:
sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M
I have the same situation on intrepid.
Is there a bug filed for intrepit?
--
[Hardy] Low
@Vici
I see where you are coming from but, the fact remains that there is 'NO
BUG TO FIX'.
I just updated a hardy with rt2400pci to intrepid, and the network
performance is even worse than before. if this is not a bug, what is it?
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
btw, now (8.10) only `sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 11M` is accepted here,
any higher rates gives:
Error for wireless request Set Bit Rate (8B20) :
SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument.
in 7.10 it worked like a charm, since then... from bad to worse.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with
Let me see - where is the no bug - ah yes - the no bug is in the
original driver - so the fix for the bug is to remove the broken driver
and use the original - it has worked faultlessly for years.
My last contribution - I am installing Debian Lenny and will hand
install the correct driver - no
** Bug watch added: Mandriva Linux #42180
http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42180
** Also affects: linux (Mandriva) via
http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42180
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
** Changed in: linux (Mandriva)
Status: Unknown = In Progress
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Oh thanks for that Sixgun
That is a great help. I have downloaded the driver so will try this when
I get an hour free. Didn't crash last night at all but did many times
each night all week. Seems stupid that we have to go through this
rigmarole when there is a perfectly good driver available.
@Canonical:
How much money would we have to pay to get this bug fixed?
We all like Ubuntu, know that it is an open source project and development
resources are expensive. A lot of people seem to be affected. So if everybody
pays, say $ 20, will this be enough to hire a developer to fix this
Hey Sebastian
I see where you are coming from but, the fact remains that there is 'NO
BUG TO FIX'. All that is required is that the old driver is re-instated
in the basic build - something that works does not need fixing - a heap
of junk that stops people using the complete system needs
I think that Canonical does an excellent job of balancing bug fixes and
new features. Just look how buggy openSUSE and Fedora are. Ubuntu is in
my opinion a very stable OS. We all have to keep in mind that we got
Ubuntu for free and that fixing bugs does cost money. (even if the fix
is as simple
I believe about all you have to do to ensure the other drivers don't interfere
is:
sudo gedit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
Then add the following blacklist lines to the end of the file and save:
blacklist rt2x00lib
blacklist rt2x00pci
blacklist rt2500pci
blacklist rt2500usb
Also, if you have
Hi All - Time is up
We have been searching for a cure for, what was, a perfectly good driver
for almost 6months with me on board. The solution discussed now is at
best a 'get us through' solution. The fix works fine when broadband is
behaving itself but, when it gets erratic at peak load
Just to update, with:
pre-up iwconfig wlan0 rate 11M
in my /etc/network/interfaces file, I still seem to get reasonable
speeds, decent signal quality, and no crashing during downloads.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.27-4-generic
02:09.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01)
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device 6833
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
I also get 1Mbit/s out of my rt2500 on an up to date Intrepid, and I can
force it to 54M with iwconfig.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
sixgun, where did you get the driver to use with ndiswrapper?
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The driver I used was pulled from an installation cd that came with the wifi
card. If you don't have a disk for your card, try downloading the driver at the
following website.
http://www.yournewdriver.com/Ralink_RT2500_Wireless_LAN_Card_7584.htm
It appears to be a generic type of driver that
I tried setting the rate to 54M manually for my rt2500 in Hardy, but it
continues to run slow. Why is it that the success of these solutions
seems to be so hit and miss? How could they mess something up that seems
to effect about every ralink and has no one solution to fix it?
--
[Hardy] Low
Oh yeah, and as to update on my previous comment back on 2008-08-18, it
seems that using the ndiswrapper driver is stable. I used ndisgtk to
install it.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are
Using the Intrepid LiveCD Alpha6, I can still reproduce this bug.
In my case, typing in a command line
sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M
brought the network up to normal speed.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug
Are people still working on this bug? i noticed immediately when upgrading from
Gutsy to Hardy that my connection signal dropped from ~97% to ~37%, and it's
way too slow.
And yes, I'm using the rt2500 driver
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Ha - I typed too soon
I just got lucky and had a rare moment of calm after slowing down to
11M. The driver now crashes my machine all the time. It is almost
unusable. What on earth are the developers doing allowing this to
continue when the old driver was perfect for years. Why should I or
Hi Niskitonf
I can confirm that with my Asus / AMD Athlon and Belkin card system -
changing from 54M to 11M seems to have cleared the bug - I haven't
crashed once since the mod.
Thanks for that Niskitonf - I have been without a stable system since I
upgraded to Hardy Heron back about Easter.
I have an Edimax EW7128g, using the ralink RT61 driver, which apparently
should work out of the box on Ubuntu Hardy
(http://www.linuxemporium.co.uk/products/wireless/). Anyway, it does,
and iwconfig shows that it is correctly recognised as connecting via 54M
11g . However, download speed is
To correct and clarify:
It is actually the Edimax EW 7318Ug that I am using, which is a USB wifi
dongle, and I am running Hardy in 64-bit format.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a
It seems to depend on the wireless access point you are using, too.
pre-up iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M
worked for me when I used a T-Sinus 1054 DSL AP (shipped by T-Online in
Germany), but with the Arcor-DSL Wlan-Modem 200 built by Zyxel, the bandwidth
was as low as ever.
However, thanks to Cedric
I still have the same problems with kernel 2.6.27.1 for my Asus WL-107g wlan
card (Ralink RT2500 chipset).
I was not able to test it with 2.6.26 .
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a
With kernel 2.6.26 the Asus WL-107g wlan card (Ralink RT2500 chipset) was also
at low speed.
Sorry for my wrong answer in the previous post.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The issue is not fixed in 2.6.27 for my rt2500 : still the same
symptoms. (I have not tested the 2.6.26)
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the
upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would
appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.
There are one of two ways you should be able to test:
1) If you are comfortable
The iwconfig wlan0 rate 54m solution, with the minipci-based cards at
least, appears to make iwconfig report the proper 54mb rate, but the
actual data rate is still sub-1mb. stephspynx, you can confirm this by
transferring a very large file between two computers on your local LAN.
--
[Hardy]
Yes, on my internal network it's definitely increased from 30 Kb/s to an
average 300 Kb/s between local machines.
This is an output from my card info:
02:00.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01)
Subsystem: Belkin F5D7010 Wireless G Notebook Network Card
A simple solution that worked for me is here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=836237
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I just tried backports-modules again with my minipci rt2500; it
definitely doesn't fix the problem. Connection is at 1MB/s and file
transfer speeds match this.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because
I confirm the same failure with the backports-modules as Shawn.
So far, the machine that I installed the CVS driver on has worked fine
for the last month. The machine with the NDiswrapper driver, I decided
to try installing the CVS driver again, and it did work, but not without
a minor
Using driver rt2500usb for an internal wireless chip on my laptop.
lsusb output:
Bus 005 Device 002: ID 148f:2573 RaLink Technology, Corp.
Tested with kernel 2.6.24-19-generic (linux-image-generic, version
2.6.24-19.36) installed as an update to clean Hardy 8.04.1 install.
Result: WiFi was
How is it possible that such a small problem takes so long to solve?
A lot of people are using wireless with this chipset.
Anyway thanks in advance.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can confirm the problem. Please repair this quickly: it looks so bad
in a LTS version. And many computers are affected, because this is a
very common wireless chipset.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug
Can we at least agree that people having no network access on their
laptops for approaching *8 MONTHS* now is of High importance, and mark
this accordingly?
My laptop is a brick with Hardy on it.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You
I agree this issue is of high importance.
On my desktop I've changed to an atheros based card to work around it
It is not just ubuntus fault, the rt2x00 project is light on developers
right now and it's unfortunate that as they have been merged into the
mainline tree they have had so many
I can also confirm that linux-backports-modules-hardy does not work for
me. (RaLink RT2500, UbuntuStudio 8.04)
I get about 3 mins of wireless at 800kbs, then it drops to 0.2kbs.
I was going to spend the last 3 days solid doing some tutorial
screencasts for Inkscape, but instead I have spent 3
With Ubuntu kernel 2.6.24.18-generic, I was able to get my RT2500 to
work full speed by using the rt2500-cvs-2008060319 driver. On a
different machine using Ubuntu kernel 2.6.24.19-generic and the same
RT2500 card, I had no choice, but to resort to using the winxp driver
under ndiswrapper.
So
Using
- linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-19-generic
does not fix the 1M problem. Still low signal quality and 1M speed after reboot.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Comment 49: Sebastian Urban
I just put the following file in /etc/network/if-up.d/ and made it executable
to fix this problem.
I tried this and it seemingly fixed a majority of the speed issue. The
quality issue remains but I guess simply setting the rate works well.
This should be a
I've tried just about everything suggested to fix this issue, short of
using ndiswrapper with the Windows drivers - nothing helps to keep the
network connected consistently at a reasonable speed.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You
I just put the following file in /etc/network/if-up.d/ and made it
executable to fix this problem.
** Attachment added: /etc/network/if-up.d/ralink-fix
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14908987/ralink-fix
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Compiling and installing an older module mitigate the problem in my situation.
Compiling the latest vanilla kernel doesn't solve the problem, the bug is still
there in upstream.
The older module is available as Compat Wireless package version 2.0.14.
This package is downloadable in this page:
i've been playing around with hardy proposed and hardy backports
modules.
i've noticed that there are two different versions of the module (at
least).
using modinfo rt2500pci there seems to be a 2.0.10 version and a 2.1.5
version
the 2.0.10 version seems to work better for me.
I think 2.1.5 is
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I confirm this bug is *not* fixed with linux-backports-
modules-2.6.24-16-generic (version 2.6.24-16.14). The rate is still 1M
by default.
According to this relevant upstream discussion:
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=5t=4579st=0sk=tsd=astart=30
it seems the bug is still
On Sunday, the instability with my wireless card had increased to the
level where it was requiring a re-boot every 30 secs or so. It was so
unstable as to make the distribution unusable and I had decided to try
and return to Dapper till the bug was fixed in Hardy.
However, there was a rare window
Wayne, what do you recommend to do? What exact bug has to be tracked? This very
one states confirmed (this is good) and triaged (does not sound as good).
Do you recommend to install the backports package and wait TLS to honour the
'S' in its acronym? How in earth has this been possible to happen
Some short comments:
- This is definitely a regression. In Gutsy (even Feisty!) there was a
reliable version of the driver. In Hardy there is a crappier version
related to the code that was merged into the main linux tree. I quote
from the front page rtx00 upstream web site:
rt2x00 enters
my second dot point I should have said gutsy instead of hardy.
My point is gutsy had a better rt2500pci than hardy, all because of the
chronological accident of hardy locking in on a kernel version that had
a temporarily bad merge of the rt2x00 tree.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 /
I recently had to re-build my system (now: ASUS M2N-VM HDMI
motherboard, EVGA NVidia e-GeForce 8800GT 512, AMD AM2 Athlon 64 4800+,
Corsair 512MBx2 DDR2 PC5300 RAM, Sony DWG120A DVD+/-RW and - RaLink
(Belkin) RT2500 PCI 802.11g (F5D7000) wireless network card) and
installed Hardy 32bit. The new
It took me a day, many reboots, and only worse performance:
I installed linux-backports-modules-hardy (NOT the -386, as I inadvertently
did, or the -rt, but the -generic, as automatically selected).
Speed still set to 1 Mb instead of 54Mb.
Dramatic worse performance after a connection was broken
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Question on Andreas Gnaus 2008-05-07 21:38:03 UTC contribution: in
Synaptic, I see a couple of similar units. Do you mean the complete
backport package for all modules that have had a backport, or only
linux-backports-modules-hardy-rt ? Do you have success with it ?
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with
Have the same problem the only solution for me was to switch back to an
older kernel. I'm waiting till this is resolved in the newer kernel.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Btw, it's still a problem in 2.6.24-17-generic. I'm using
2.6.24-17-generic for now
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I agree with previous posters. This issue is absolutely not medium.
LTS = RaLink 2500 fixed, period. I don't claim to be an expert, but I
went through this ugly wireless setup process three releases ago to get
WPA2 working, and seeing it borked again just sucks. Fix this. Please.
--
[Hardy]
Please try and see if installing linux-backports-modules-hardy solves
your problems.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi, I succeeded in installing the serialmonkey drivers and now I have full
speed internet again, at least till the next update.
Because the process is not easy at all (at least for newbies like me), I have
documented it in ubuntu forums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4894088
'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' helped me out with RaLink RT2500 802.11g
Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01) / Subsystem: Linksys WMP54G 2.0 PCI Adapter
Thanks a lot for the workaround.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug
Hi, I'm another guy trying substitute his Windows XP by Ubuntu 8.04 (...and I'm
about to give up).
The last problem I found so far is exactly defined in this bug:
MSI PC54G2 with rt2500 drivers and Internet extremely slow.
Question: Is adding the lines...
ifconfig wlan0 up
iwconfig wlan0
My network card worked fine on both 7.x-releases, but now in Hardy it
does not.
This is how I solved it (and shouldn't have had to... FAR too much hassle):
0) Install build essentials...
1) Download the rt2500 serialmonkey drivers, compile and install. (wget, make,
sudo make install)
2)
'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' and all the problems (slow connection and
50% of signal strength) with rt2500pci are gone. Thanks!
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' and all the problems (slow connection and
50% of signal strength) with rt2500pci are gone. Thanks!
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
uname -a; lspci | grep RaL
Linux Aragorn 2.6.24-16-386 #1 Thu Apr 10 12:50:06 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
03:00.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI (rev 01)
'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' works for me too...how can i automate it!?!?
thanks
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with
but the led of my PCMCIA card does blink no more!!!
WHY!!!
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I have the same problem here with a Hercules Wireless PCI G card.
I downloaded the drivers from rt2x00.serialmonkey.com and now everything works
well.
The priority of this should be high as this is a serious problem and very easy
to fix.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Same problem here with rt2500pci. I've got a more reliable connection using
Compat Wireless driver available here:
http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/en/users/Download
Using the latest package do not solve the problem, downloading the old package
(25 March 2008) the wireless card seem to
Installed latest backports packages, but my card still initializes at
1Mbps. I can set the rate to 54Mbps manually and get decent
speed/signal.
$ uname -a; lspci | grep RaL
Linux paragon 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 13:23:42 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
00:0b.0 Network controller: RaLink
I've installed linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-generic and my card (rt2500pci
based) now initialize at 54Mbps at boot time.
WEP 128 is working.
Great work !
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because
I'm having the same problem after upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy.
Considering that this chipset is used in many low end wireless cards I
believe this is a problem that should be addressed before Hardy's final
release. In the current state many folks are going to be left with
nearly useless wireless
I've the same problem in Hardy Beta, Kernel 2.6.24-16 and rt2500pci card.
I've 10/10 Mbps Internet Optical Fiber connection, but speed indication on
Ralink card is 1 Mb/s and signal is 50/70 %, very slow speed (50/100 kbps).
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Thought I'd just say that I ran into this problem after upgrading Gutsy
to Hardy, i.e. slow connection, 50% signal strength, but that running
the command 'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' has fixed both aspects of the
problem. So to me it seems the driver works but is just being configured
wrongly.
I'm not sure why this is Medium. Most computers these days are
doorstops if they don't have reliable networking.
You have a LTS release due next month and you are persisting with
releasing broken drivers for Ralink chipsets. There was a point about a
month ago where someone needed to make a call
Nice!
Let's hope the patchset will be considered stable enough for inclusion...
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Leann Ogasawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Just wanted to let you know that one of the Ubuntu kernel team devs has
a patchset to bring the rt2x00 code in Hardy
Hi Nicolas,
Just wanted to let you know that one of the Ubuntu kernel team devs has
a patchset to bring the rt2x00 code in Hardy uptodate with what upstream
has. It is currently being discussed since we are in Beta Freeze for
Hardy and almost at the kernel freeze. If it does get pulled in,
Confirmed...after upgrading from 7.10 to 8.04 it defaults to about half
the signal level and sets the bit rate 1M.
Running 'sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M' increases the tranfer rate but
the signal level is still a lot lower then in 7.10.
$ iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:freebsdap
I confirm this bug with my PC54G2. Tthe bit rate is set to 1Mb/s.
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi everyone,
I have an Asus WL-107g wlan card (Ralink RT2500 chipset) that works great under
Edubuntu 7.10 but with Hardy Heron (with the latest updates until now) the
traffic is very slow (about 40Kb/s i.s.o 400Kb/s).
Thanks for the support, bye
Jef
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 /
** Summary changed:
- [Hardy] Backport rt2400/rt2500 drivers
+ [Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400/rt2500 drivers
** Tags added: regression
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
My rt2400 card works well with rt2400-source built with module-assistant
(after blacklisting rt2400pci)
** Summary changed:
- [Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400/rt2500 drivers
+ [Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
--
[Hardy] Low bandwidth with rt2400 / rt2500 drivers
Could a switch to the legacy drivers be considered at this point for the
rt2400/2500 hardware, knowing that the legacy drivers have worked great
on previous releases, and that the 2.6.24 rt2x00 won't be fixed (cf
previous posts)?
I'll redo some tests, but IIRC, the range of the wifi link was also
87 matches
Mail list logo
