CinePaint 1.0 was released in November 2011:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cinepaint/files/CinePaint/
http://www.cinepaint.org/2011/11/29/cinepaint-1-0-linux-source-tarball-available/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Apart from the popular HDR creation and editing, CinePaint is invaluable
for keen photographers due to its
x high bit depth support (GIMP does not support it yet, Krita is buggy
and slow, fotoxx is more organiser like digikam-showfoto combo rather
then editor supporting layers, clone tool, etc.) a
> One final program, has anyone tried fotoxx?
> http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx/
> Packages available at getdeb:
> - http://www.getdeb.net/software/Fotoxx
> - http://www.getdeb.net/updates/Ubuntu/all#how_to_install
Never mind, I got the idea. :)
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https:
Thank you for your answer, it's more than enough to see it's still
required and irreplaceable. :)
One final program, has anyone tried fotoxx?
http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx/
Packages available at getdeb:
- http://www.getdeb.net/software/Fotoxx
- http://www.getdeb.net/updates/Ubuntu/all#how
The Flickr HDR group is a great example of the term "HDR" being used
completely wrong.
If you can display it on your monitor, it is, by definition, *not* HDR.
Monitors are all LDR. (CinePaint compresses the dynamic range to LDR
while editing.)
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.l
I've used both cinepaint and qtpfsgui a fair amount. qtpfsgui only lets
you merge multiple LDR images to HDR, and optionally tone map them back
to LDR (this last conversion is what is often incorrectly referred to as
"HDR").
CinePaint is a full image editor that supports HDR images. Does that
su
I'm more-or-less back online, I will probably start redesigning the
packages in a month or so. I must admit that I don't use this package
and I simply did it out of packaging interest. :)
But I would like someone to answer the following:
1. What purpose cinepaint serves that makes it unique?
2. Ar
@jengel: just remove icc-profiles package (or delete the listed icc
profile manually) and try to install again.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
I attempted install from experimental ppa. This failed with following
error:
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/oyranos-
icc_0.1.9-0ubuntu1~ppakarmic0.1_all.deb: trying to overwrite
'/usr/share/color/icc/PhotoGamutRGB_avg6c.icc', which is also in package
icc-profiles 0
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubun
The packages for elektra, oyranos and cinepaint are currently being built in
this experimental ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~cinepaint/+archive/experimental
Thanks for the PPA. Note that oyranos-icc conflicts with "icc-profiles"
package.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad
Savvas Radevic wrote on 2009-09-27:
> If someone wants to take and fix the packages (names, dependencies, etc)
> please do!
> I might not have the time for about 6 months.
It seems you don't need to maintain libelektra packages -Christophe
Mehay already packaged libelektra, see https://launchpad
If someone wants to take and fix the packages (names, dependencies
etc) please do!
I might not have the time for about 6 months. I have some real life
problems that I need to sort out. Plus, I'm stuck without internet
except some limited access and email.
Cheers! :)
On 9/27/09, Paco wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
I can't try a new time the bug, but when i left cinepaint yesterday, it wasn't
really close.
I started cinepaint in the terminal, do some things as create an image, et draw
a little on it.
I closed all the window with the button close.
And later, when i was looking for the top command, cinepa
If it is gotten back into the archive it can be backported to earlier
releases.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
And would it be possible to get 9.04 version?
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
*That* no, at least not right now. We're past the time for new packages,
we'd have to wait for Ubuntu 10.04+
Until then, I can hopefully re-package the badly named packages (e.g.
elektra to libelektra0 etc.) and report any errors the users mention. :)
2009/9/7 Shang Wu
> Thanks for building the
Thanks for building the PPA.
/me installing it now!
Any chance to get that into Universe?
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
> built from scratch
Correction: built from scratch based on fedora, archlinux and old
debian cinepaint package.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've done the "legwork" for the packaging. It's a new package, built
from scratch for all 3 packages (about 4 hours of head banging against
the wall). I'm new in library binary packaging, so there surely must
be some mistakes in the packaging. I used cinepaint from the 0.25.0
from CVS (a version c
I was assigned as that was part of the process for getting the package
in REVU. However it just sat there so there's been no other movement
from my end.
I'm glad you've packaged for karmic. Is the packaging someone is
working on for Debian - or is it the old sidux one I was using?
Sent from
Removing the assigned person, since there was no activity for quite a
while. If I'm wrong, please re-set yourself. :)
** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Caroline Ford (secretlondon) => (unassigned)
--
Please
Does anyone want to test a new build for karmic (ubuntu 9.10)?
It runs, but I don't have example files (nor the time to be frank) to test
cinepaint. :)
The packages for elektra, oyranos and cinepaint are currently being built in
this experimental ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~cinepaint/+archive/ex
Thanks Savvas Radevic.
The sudix.net repository version also has the dependency on
libopenexr2ldbl (only in hardy) and crashes when I try to adjust
brightness on an hdr.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are
I think we just have to wait for a stable release with a .tar.gz:
"On the Linux side, I thought I was going to quickly wrap a release long
ago so we can get back into Ubuntu and Debian. When I did some testing I
found fresh bugs in the CVS version. One that's particularly annoying is
all the windo
Is there a better place to file a bug against the cinepaint package in
Caroline's ppa?
If you open a HDR image and try to change the contrast (Image / Colors /
Brightness - Contrast), it crashes.
An HDR for testing: http://www.chaosreigns.com/hdr/StLouisArchMultExpEV_HDR.exr
The bright pink and
The cinepaint package in Caroline's ppa (thanks) depends on the
libopenexr2ldbl package which is only available in hardy. This is easy
to deal with by adding another line to /etc/apt/sources.list - both
required lines (including Caroline's ppa) are as follows:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/secretl
I have reported licensing issues for proper packaging:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/index.php?func=detail&aid=2556463&group_id=75029&atid=542706
(set to Priority 2, since its low priority, but still important to be
fixed).
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Found another bug to look out for:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437837
I'll try and create a debian source package using caroline's, the gutsy and
debian git:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/cinepaint.git;a=summary
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.laun
There's 0.25.0 in CVS already.
CVS links:
http://cinepaint.cvs.sourceforge.net/
cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@cinepaint.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/cinepaint login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cinepaint.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/cinepaint
co cinepaint-project
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
Sounds so microsoft - just drop out some programs users could possibly
not be willing to play with. Ubuntu is still even worse if you compare
ubuntu's LTS (couple of months) to XP.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification becau
setting as in progress and assigned to me, as per
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages?action=show&redirect=MOTU%2FPackages%2FNew
** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Caroline Ford (secretlondon)
Status: New => In Progress
** Description changed
This is the package that I've built in my ppa. There are a few
problems with it - the colour profile thing doesn't work out of the
box.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
http://sidux.net/etorix/i386/
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
There is a testing package produced by Aedan Kelly with the support of
upstream. I've stuck it in my PPA although it needs more work.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Changed in: cinepaint (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #465691
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465691
** Also affects: cinepaint (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465691
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://
The package was dropped from hardy because it was dropped from Debian, and the
archive admins routinely remove such packages when they're no longer available
in Debian. Per http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/removals.txt, the
removal reason given was:
(From Debian) RoM ; obsolete, buggy
The package was dropped from hardy because it was dropped from Debian, and the
archive admins routinely remove such packages when they're no longer available
in Debian. Per http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/removals.txt, the
removal reason given was:
(From Debian) RoM ; obsolete, buggy
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:09:54PM -, Caroline Ford wrote :
> I've been told on irc that the cinepaint package used gtk1 (which Debian
> dropped support for) and that it was orphaned. I'm also told that it can
> be built with --enable-gtk2.
>
I enabled it in gutsy, actually
> --
> Please r
I've been told on irc that the cinepaint package used gtk1 (which Debian
dropped support for) and that it was orphaned. I'm also told that it can
be built with --enable-gtk2.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because yo
The reason it's not in hardy is because it was removed from sid and
therefore wasn't synced across.
Debian removed it from sid because of the packaging error linked to
above.
It doesn't need packaging as much as packaging fixing. It was also
orphaned in Debian I think.
--
Please re-add cinepain
subscribe ubuntu-archive
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:02:24PM -, Murat Güneş wrote :
> ** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>
> ** Tags added: needs-packaging
>
It doesn't really "needs packaging", as there's an existing package in gutsy.
However, I suspec
** Changed in: cinepaint (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Debian Bug #435890: cinepaint: not binNMU-safe, misuse of ${Source-
Version}
was the reason it got pulled.
--
Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
44 matches
Mail list logo
