[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2009-01-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-11-07 Thread Martin Schaaf
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-10-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed Target: None = release0.2 -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-10-28 Thread Martin Schaaf
This patch is included in 0.10.5. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-19 Thread Mikele
ok, finally I found 5 minutes to fix this. now the config GUI checks for validity of the regex, warns the user and doesn't add the regex if it does not compile. check if this try-except approach fits your programming style. probably, since there is no logging facility (I read you are going to

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-19 Thread Mikele
sorry, I imagine this is not the proper place to ask, but my knowledge of launchpad is superficial at best. I realy like this software, is simple but effective, and I'd like to help, as it seems simple enough for me to give side contributions. I have noticed right now that it have been forked to

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, Thank you for your patch. I appreciate a lot your motivation and help. I don't maintain Sbackup (at least for now) anymore but as you have submitted a patch, it would be nice to have it included in Ubuntu for other users. There is a plan to re-merge Sbackup and NSsbackup though. But

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, Thank you for this bug report. NSsbackup has indeed the same problem. About your question, I recommend you post a patch here and upstream. But I don't think the upstream project is maintained anymore. You'll have more chance of having your patch in Ubuntu by posting it here. Best

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I confirm the Bug for NSsbackup also. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
oops, I meant Sbackup ** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug