[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-11-03 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ovn - 20.12.0-0ubuntu3~cloud0 --- ovn (20.12.0-0ubuntu3~cloud0) focal-wallaby; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . ovn (20.12.0-0ubuntu3) hirsute; urgency=medium . * Add RBAC rules for IGMP_Group table (LP:

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-11-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ovn - 20.12.0-0ubuntu3 --- ovn (20.12.0-0ubuntu3) hirsute; urgency=medium * Add RBAC rules for IGMP_Group table (LP: #1914988): - d/p/lp-1914988-Add-IGMP_Group-to-ovn-controller-RBAC.patch -

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-11-02 Thread Corey Bryant
Testing has completed successfully for hirsute-proposed and wallaby- proposed. Test results from "Patchset 5 Nov 02 3:05 PM" of the charm- octavia review above. focal-wallaby-ha-ovn https://openstack-ci- reports.ubuntu.com/artifacts/d85/815543/5/check/focal-wallaby-ha- ovn/d85d874/ : SUCCESS in

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-31 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-26 Thread Corey Bryant
Testing for this SRU is running here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-octavia/+/815543 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table To manage

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-22 Thread Andre Ruiz
Just a comment on wallaby-proposed packages, I installed those on all ovn-related units and don't see errors about RBAC anymore, and I also didn't notice any other collateral effect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-20 Thread Frode Nordahl
The RBAC rules are installed into the database by ovn-northd on the central units. Depending on which order you upgraded the packages you may need to force the controllers to reconnect. As for ovn-*ctl hanging, that is a sign you are attempting to talk to a non-leader instance of the database.

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
Just upgrading the packages (from focal-wallaby-proposed) did not help. I upgraded on all ovn-chassis (even the octavia ones), all ovn-central, all ovn-chassis-gateway. I also deleted the LB and recreated completely. On a separate note, when I try to run "ovn-sbctl find connection" the command

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, I'll try to update from proposed and test. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table To manage notifications

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Frode Nordahl
Andre, we are currently in the bit odd situation where it is fix released for focal but only fix committed for hirsute/focal-wallaby. The good news is that the fix is available in -proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
I seem to be having this problem on a focal / wallaby deployment, although I don't have that exact message (about prohibit update of port_binding), I only have: root@srv2dell001p:/var/log/ovn# grep -i perm ovn-controller.log

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-05 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Liam, or anyone else affected, Accepted ovn into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/20.12.0-0ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-09-23 Thread Frode Nordahl
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-09-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~fnordahl/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+git/ovn/+merge/409046 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-09-23 Thread Frode Nordahl
** Description changed: - When using Openstack Ussuri with OVN 20.03 and adding a floating IP - address to a unbound port the ovn-controller on the hypervisor - repeatedly reports: + [Impact] + The OpenStack Octavia service will not work after upgrade to Hirsute. + + [Test Plan] + Execute the

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-09-08 Thread Frode Nordahl
** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table To

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-09-01 Thread Frode Nordahl
@Dariusz, the RBAC rules are in the ovn-northd binary and is applied to the database. Do you have the updated packages installed on the central nodes and are you sure the ovn-northd and possibly the ovn-sb-ovsdb services have restarted after the package upgrade? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-08-30 Thread Dariusz Smigiel
I had exactly the same issue right now on Focal with 20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 3 of 6 ovn-controller nodes were reported as "XXX". After restarting all of failing ones, only 2 of 3 reconnected without issues. The last one ovn-controller was still having problems. The only thing which worked was a

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-07-15 Thread Frode Nordahl
** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: ovn (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ovn (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ovn (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-06-11 Thread Giuseppe Petralia
I can confirm that on Bionic upgrading to 20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fixed this issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-05-06 Thread Frode Nordahl
Thank you for adding the extended detail, Camille! I would like to note that the fix for this is now in -proposed on Focal and is just around the corner to be promoted to -updates. The SRU can be tracked in bug 1924981. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-05-06 Thread Camille Rodriguez
To confirm this is the bug in /var/log/ovn/ovn-controller.log on the hypervisors look for:. 2021-03-02T10:33:35.517Z|35359|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client \"juju-eab186-zaza-d26c8c079cc7-11.project.serverstack\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit modification

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-03-25 Thread Frode Nordahl
Fixes has been applied upstream for all versions of OVN and we are awaiting upstream to cut point releases to get these and other updates into Ubuntu. We are also working on extending the upstream tests to encompass testing with RBAC by default. While waiting for that I have picked the relevant

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-03-05 Thread Frode Nordahl
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/list/?series=232350 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table To manage notifications

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-03-02 Thread Frode Nordahl
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/20210302172353.1020143-1-frode.nord...@canonical.com/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-03-02 Thread Frode Nordahl
** Description changed: When using Openstack Ussuri with OVN 20.03 and adding a floating IP - address to a port the ovn-controller on the hypervisor repeatedly - reports: + address to a unbound port the ovn-controller on the hypervisor + repeatedly reports: