[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2014-10-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: coreutils (Debian) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 Title: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted To manage notificatio

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2010-02-17 Thread James Westby
I don't think we are going to do anything about this now unfortunately. Almost all supported releases now have new enough kernels, so there is little incentive for future development, and the cost is quite high. Thanks, James ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2009-04-13 Thread C de-Avillez
upstream has this commented at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug- coreutils/2008-08/msg00149.html. It can be summarised as: "naruto canada" wrote: > On 8/19/08, Jim Meyering wrote: >> "naruto canada" wrote: >>> Starting from coreutils-6.3.tar.bz2 upward, when compiled against >>> glibc-2.5.

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2009-03-03 Thread Vantrax
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New => Confirmed -- rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2009-01-07 Thread Vantrax
Confirmed again by me, test case reproducible as above. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2008-04-29 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: coreutils (Debian) Status: New => Won't Fix -- rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2008-03-20 Thread James Westby
Hi, I'm just dumping a few notes in to the bug so that I don't lose them. Firstly, the linked Debian bug has some good analysis of the problem. I found a couple of possibly related links: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/6839 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2008-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) => James Westby (james-w) -- rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 192239] Re: rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted

2008-02-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: coreutils (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- rm shouldn't require /proc to be mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-