[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2024-02-28 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2022-03-23 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Still no updates in the upstream bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2022-01-20 Thread Paride Legovini
No real movement happened upstream or in Debian. I'm not sure we should consider this Triaged, as strictly speaking this is not even a bug (as Seth noted in comment 1), and there's nothing we can actually do to make the situation better. Even upstream doesn't have clear plans or suggestions. I'm l

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-11-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: clamav (Debian) Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket To manage notif

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-11-19 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
The bug has been forwarded upstream, so I'm marking it as such. ** Also affects: clamav (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989549 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.clamav.net/ #12782 https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cg

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: clamav Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-09 Thread Bryce Harrington
Thanks for filing the bug in debian, and I agree that's the right place to continue discussions. You also mentioned in the original bug some aspects (such as auth on incoming connections) should be addressed upstream, so you may want to also file bug reports there. >From that, if there come to be

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-09 Thread Stephane Chazelas
> Hello Stephane, maybe joining the amavisd-new user's to the clamav group would be a simpler way around the stricter socket permissions you are proposing? Hi Simon, No, as I said in comment #4, that doesn't work as amavisd-new doesn't set supplementary IDs, just does a setuid() and setgid() with

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-09 Thread Simon Déziel
Hello Stephane, maybe joining the amavisd-new user's to the clamav group would be a simpler way around the stricter socket permissions you are proposing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: clamav Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket To manage notifications about

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-08 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: clamav via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989549 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-07 Thread Stephane Chazelas
> I suggest proposing your patch in a Debian bug to get the maintainer's feedback on it. I've now raised https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989549 Should we carry on discussion over there? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #989549 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-07 Thread Stephane Chazelas
>From systemd.service(5): > Type= > Configures the process start-up type for this service unit. > One of simple, exec, forking, oneshot, dbus, notify or > idle: > > • If set to simple (the default if ExecStart= is > specified but neither Type= nor BusName= are), the

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-04 Thread Seth Arnold
Hmm, I thought the only 'reliable' way of addressing the 'not yet active' problem was to use the sd_notify(3) family of functions to let systemd know when a service is actually ready to handle requests. I suggest proposing your patch in a Debian bug to get the maintainer's feedback on it. (A test c

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

2021-06-04 Thread Seth Arnold
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393 Title: any