[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-11-13 Thread nick black
2.4.9 is present in Jellyfish, so things seem to be working fine now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-09-23 Thread nick black
Ahhh, it was due to the Impish Debian freeze. Well, we'll know soon enough! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-09-01 Thread nick black
hrmmm, new versions don't seem to be entering Impish. is that due to something changing since the release of Debian Bullseye, or is notcurses misbehaving on Ubuntu CI? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-08-17 Thread nick black
Alright, the impish release still has 2.3.13+dfsg.1-1, but as soon as 2.3.13+dfsg.1-2, we'll know whether this is still a problem. All autopkgtests have succeeded within the Debian build infrastructure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-08-15 Thread nick black
fwiw, i can no longer reproduce this locally, though i also can't point at any particular commit that ought have fixed it =/. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-08-15 Thread nick black
with the Debian freeze ending, i've reenabled this autopkgtest and am putting up a candidate package now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To man

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-17 Thread nick black
Agreed, and I can now reproduce this failure locally. Tracking in https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/1784. Thanks! ** Bug watch added: github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues #1784 https://github.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/issues/1784 -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-16 Thread Robert Ancell
There seems to be a bug in the fix, the test is failing: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/n/notcurses/20210616_142532_8cc55@/log.gz Seems to be missing the '-' for the '-m': autopkgtest [14:22:49]: test demo: TERM=xterm notcurses-demo -c m0,2,0,2 -d0 Invalid d

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-16 Thread nick black
[schwarzgerat](0) $ apt-show-versions notcurses-bin notcurses-bin:amd64/unstable 2.3.4+dfsg.1-3 uptodate [schwarzgerat](0) $ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-16 Thread Robert Ancell
Thanks very much Nick! We should be in-sync with Debian, so I don't think the ",flaky" was added in Ubuntu. However, I'm not too familiar with this package so not 100% sure if something automated has added those. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
Present in Debian Unstable. ** Changed in: notcurses (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: notcurses (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
All built, uploaded to the archive. This ought flow to Ubuntu soon enough. Thanks again! ** Changed in: notcurses (Debian) Assignee: (unassigned) => nick black (dankamongmen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=notcurses&suite=sid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
by the way @robert-ancell, i notice that you have ",flaky" in there. this isn't present in the Debian package. has it been added in Ubuntu? ** Changed in: notcurses (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => nick black (dankamongmen) ** Also affects: notcurses (Debian) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
[schwarzgerat](0) $ dput *.changes Trying to upload package to ftp-master (ftp.upload.debian.org) Checking signature on .changes gpg: /home/dank/src/dsscaw/notcurses_2.3.4+dfsg.1-3_source.changes: Valid signature from 5F43400C21CBFACC Checking signature on .dsc gpg: /home/dank/src/dsscaw/notcurses

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/notcurses/-/commit/d73556faadfd08013b03ccedbd7348edbddab53e -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To manage notificati

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/notcurses/-/commit/30a0e9d39eb45acca5292c85ee2cd154f275e1f9 building new package now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
h my patch dropped the -m2 entirely, but i like your -m0,2,0,2 solution, nice. i'll use that instead! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To man

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
I of course mean 2.3.4+dfsg.1-3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread nick black
How embarrassing -- thanks a lot for the heads-up! I think the best way to fix this will be to do so in the Debian package in Unstable, which I assume is how this is reaching Ubuntu. Sound good? This would target 2.3.4+dfsg-3, and I can have it uploaded to Debian Unstable within the hour. -- You

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread Robert Ancell
Fix is to replace debian/test/control: # Execute notcurses-demo with: # -c: seed PRNG with known constant for semi-reproducible timings # -m2: use 2-cell margins on all sides (to test margins) # -d0: delay multiplier of 0 (no artificial delays) Test-Command: TERM=xterm notcurses-demo -c -m2 -d0

[Bug 1932103] Re: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is FTBFS

2021-06-15 Thread Robert Ancell
There may also be a means of making the simulated terminal bigger on the build server, but I don't know how to do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932103 Title: 2.3.4+dfsg.1-2 is