Launchpad has imported 33 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443689.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
closing this bug since the upstream bug was closed as expired after a
fix confirmation. since we dont know when it got fixed i am marking this
bug as invalid. if anyone still face this issue with nautilus 2.32
please feel free to open this bug again
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status:
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: New = Expired
** Changed in: nautilus
Importance: Unknown = High
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gvfs
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Please see the bug below showing similar behaviour on Intrepid, together
with some steps to isolate the problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/316862
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
The bug you're talking about has been better described and triaged here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/207072
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485
Some effort by ubuntu developers has been made, although not (yet) successfull.
--
Remote Samba shares not showing
This is way too ugly...
Let me summarize:
1. Browsing SMB password-protected shares does not work in Hardy - there is no
password prompt any more. It used to work in Gutsy.
2. This extremely retarded regression is being actively reported by lots of
users on any bugzilla that exists on the
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Unknown = New
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
setting the bug to triage because there is an upstream task but it seems
to describe random issues and it not really workable now, users having
an issue which seems different of the one described on bugzilla should
open a new bug rather
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =
** Changed in: nautilus (Fedora)
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Same problem for me:
1. smb://computer_ip_or_name: not work, blank screen, authentication dialog not
appears.
2. smb://computer_ip_or_name/some_share_folder: ok, it work!
This fails on Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 RC all automatic updates to April 22,
Ubuntu Gutsy machines work fine on same network.
--
Hardy with latest updates (11 April) having same problem. Browsing
printers also do not work. pyNeighborhood works. After mounting with
pyNeighborhood I can see the directory and browse it.
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
I still have this bug (09 April) - hardy with latest updates.
Shares are not shown in nautilus, but if i put
smb://computer_IP/share
it works.
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because
Added the upstream bug mentioned in comment #13
Markus
** Also affects: nautilus via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522494
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
Updated Hardy at 28th. of March and Nautilus worked fin in browsing the
share of my Windows PC. Then opend a Windows share leads to a password
dialog. After entering my WindowsXP Account i got access to the share.
This Bug could be closed (at least for me).
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up
I have reported a new bug, describing exactly the problem in my usecase:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/207072
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are
those comments from different users are not clear, does browsing the
network using the samba tools without password work correctly? are you
in the same workgroup than the other boxes?
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You
My Ubuntu is in the same WorkGroup like the other PC i use (called EZNord)
smbclient and smbtree both showed a error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
I could not determine if this error is due to password poblem of samba
or not. But because i activated guest accounts on my windows computers
ubuntu
There is already a genome/nautilus bug which adresses the same error :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522494
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
In my situation, being or not in the same workgroup does not make a difference.
In any case here are some detailed descriptions of what happens. As I wrote in
comment 8, I have a virtual machine running hardy-beta, which is in the same
worgroup (or Domain) of all other network machines. This is
this bug seems to have a collection of different usecases,
configurations and issues, that's not really manageable now
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
are those shares in the same workground as the hardy box?
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I suppose you mean workgroup.
In my case, when using the hardy-alfa6-live CD the box was not in the same
workgroup as the others.
However, the virtual machine running up-to-date hardy was integrated in the
same domain of all other network machines (including those running gutsy and
debian,
Updated to Hardy Beta : bug is confirmed.
Tried commandline and got :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L w4de3rsy0001173 -Ugast
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[EZNORD] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
Sharename Type Comment
-
Commandline with smbtree :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbtree -N
EZNORD
\\W4DE3RSY0001173 Ditmar Rose Tel:-650
cli_rpc_pipe_open: cli_nt_create failed on pipe \srvsvc to machine
W4DE3RSY0001173. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
\\UBUNTUSERVER
I just wanted to confirm this bug on a fresh install of alpha6 and after
all patches. Both network:/// and smb:/// show no servers. Network has 1
pc running vista, 1 running WHS + another laptop running gutsy. smbtree
returns the full workgroup list after entering password.
smb://server/share
I am experiencing a similar problem with hardy installed in a virtual machine
and with up-to-date packages.
When I try to browse machines in a mixed environment some of them do not show
any shared folders in nautilus.
The network is using ADS and is controlled by a windows 2003 server.
Machines
does it work using smbclient on a command line or does it has the same
issue?
--
Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have the same or at least similar problem : I use Nautilus to browse a
WindowsXP share. The UbuntuServer and the WindowsXP-Laptop are shown in
Nautilus. But when i open the WindowsXP then no shared directories are
displayed. It looks like the WindowsXP has not shared any ressource. But
i can
Thank you for your bug. Does using a command line client, smb for
example, work correctly? Could you try on hardy using the new gvfs
nautilus?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
Status: New =
Yes, command line client works fine. I have to try the new nautilus, I
haven't heard about gvfs before. I'm telling you. Good work, anyways.
Thanks!!
2008/2/20, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for your bug. Does using a command line client, smb for
example, work correctly? Could
36 matches
Mail list logo
