[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Override component to main glusterfs 10.1-1 in jammy: universe/admin -> main glusterfs-cli 10.1-1 in jammy amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main glusterfs-cli 10.1-1 in jammy arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main glusterfs-cli 10.1-1 in jammy armhf: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bu

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread david
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bu

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It's all showing up in component mismatches now (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches- proposed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE]

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Seed change merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gluster

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Here is the seed change PR: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu- seeds/+git/platform/+merge/419225 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To man

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/419225 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To man

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI - uploads done, got accepted a few hours ago and building now. Also the team subscription to the package was done. It shows in component mismatches: glusterfs: libgfapi0 libgfrpc0 libgfxdr0 libglusterfs0 MIR: #1950321 (Confirmed) MIR: #1274247 (Won't Fix) [Reverse-Depends: libgfapi0, lib

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-server/+git/team-subscriptions/+merge/419221 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-server/+git/team-subscriptions/+merge/419221 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Same for qemu, the only runtime impact is the availability of an opt-in feature. Acked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Steve Langasek
AIUI this is just enabling an additional optional stand-alone module, which is not used by default. So, FFe ack for samba. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] gl

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is the diff in the samba-vfs-modules package contents: $ diff -u samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-universe.list samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-main.list --- samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-universe.list 2022-04-08 14:14:23.928484249 -0300 +++ samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-main.list 2022-04-08 1

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks for linking that Andreas. For qemu it is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1246924 I think the FFE decision is the same for both samba/qemu and the reason to come by late the same as well (this MIR being stalled) - so I'd hope it makes it more easy to think->decide about it onc

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is the samba bug requesting glusterfs support: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618 I suppose that should be an FFe now? The diff in the samba package is shown in this MP I just filed: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/samba/+git/samba/+merge/419134

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi Łukasz, thanks for having a look - sure let me try to summarize an answer to your question. # General Yes - Debian has this enabled in both for what feels like ages. It was the supportability in main which blocked us from following that, but we had plenty of requests and are happy to finally

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I would be fine on the MIR part, but I feel like I don't have enough context and understanding to make a call on the required deltas in samba and qemu, since it's so late in the cycle. Could you give me an overview of your suspected regression potential of enabling gluterfs in both qemu and samba?