Hum... is this OK?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gscan2pdf-0.9.21$ patch -p1
../gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1.debdiff
patching file debian/changelog
patching file debian/control
patching file bin/gscan2pdf
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
Hunk #28 succeeded at 6681 with fuzz 1.
[EMAIL
Diffing it with the previous patch suggests it IS OK. The final newline
is missing for some reason.
Thanks a lot for your outstanding work on this. You definitely ROCK!
--
Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195540
You received this bug notification
I just added
XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Jeffrey Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to debian/control.
Thanks again - uploaded.
--
Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug was fixed in the package gscan2pdf - 0.9.21-1ubuntu1
---
gscan2pdf (0.9.21-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* Bug fix upload (LP: #195540)
- Fixed incorrect error saving image (LP: #195113)
- Fixed random problems importing PDF (LP: #195416)
- Set default frontend
Are the changes you introduce from Upstream? If not, it might be worth
forwarding them upstream first to get input for them.
--
Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the changes you introduce from Upstream? If not, it might be worth
forwarding them upstream first to get input for them.
I am upstream. I didn't prepare a new upstream version because
a. hardy version freeze
b. it would have new
Great. If it landed in Upstream code, that's good enough to know.
--
Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
It'd be nice if you could adhere to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField (update-maintainer of the
ubuntu-dev-tools package should do it automatically for you).
Also it'd be great if you could list this bug in debian/changelog too,
that way it'll be automatically closed on upload.
*
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'd be nice if you could adhere to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField (update-maintainer of the
ubuntu-dev-tools package should do it automatically for you).
If you want, sure, but as I am also the Debian maintainer, I
Please still change the Maintainer field - I know that in your case it's
non-sensical, but dpkg-buildpackage won't let me build a source package
*G*
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing already mentions (LP: #123456)
but maybe it should be more prominent. :-)
Thanks for all your work!
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please still change the Maintainer field - I know that in your case it's
Revised debdiff attached.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing already mentions (LP: #123456)
but maybe it should be more prominent. :-)
The closest I can
** Attachment added: gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12200490/gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: gscan2pdf (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195540
You
12 matches
Mail list logo
