[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-04-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
This is back in Jammy and working: mini-buildd | 1.9.99 | jammy/universe | source, all It didn't resolve the issue of >1.0 being generally unstable, but what we had works again. Thanks ** Changed in: mini-buildd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-04-04 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "Invalid email error fix" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag,

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-04-04 Thread Lena Voytek
Here is the debdiff patch containing the email fix. Tested and confirmed using PPA: ppa:lvoytek/mini-buildd-newest-with-email-patch. As a warning there is no upstream tarball location for mini-buildd so the patch only works when applied directly rather than through debian/patches ** Patch added:

Re: [Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-03-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
> Hopefully this can be added in a new version to > be released soon, otherwise mini-buildd may have to be re-added with a > temporary delta. Thank you Lena, but due to time - unless they release super-fast - let us prepare and add this with delta right away once the beta freeze is lifted

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-03-30 Thread Lena Voytek
I managed to fix the error by setting up a custom email validation that allows hostnames without a '.' in them to work properly. I sent the merge request upstream. Hopefully this can be added in a new version to be released soon, otherwise mini-buildd may have to be re-added with a temporary

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-03-23 Thread Lena Voytek
** Changed in: mini-buildd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: mini-buildd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965724

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-03-22 Thread Lena Voytek
After digging deeper into mini-buildd stable I can confirm that a transition to python3 from 1.0.49 would be really difficult and probably not worth all the effort depending on when 2.0 comes out. As for the bleeding edge, 1.9.98 and it is still showing the email error shown above. I'm still

[Bug 1965724] Re: 1.1.19 blocked in proposed, but 1.9.97 fails

2022-03-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Right now to me it seems we need to choose between pain, pain and more pain: - do a python3 transition with mini-buildd 1.0.49 + that seems to be the reason we had 1.1.19 in Focal, and 1.0.49 isn't ready yet + Back in Apr 2021 v2.0 was called 2 weeks away, still not released today