[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-06-01 Thread Dan Streetman
uploaded to -backports queues for bionic and focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notificati

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-06-01 Thread Dan Streetman
as impish is a non-LTS release and will EOL next month, marking as wontfix. ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19657

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-29 Thread Dan Streetman
> *If* want to fix this in bionic and focal, a full SRU will be required agreed, and that would require its own [SRU] bug separate from this [BPO] bug > I'll take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon. @teward did you get a chance to prepare this? I didn't see it in the upload

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-21 Thread Dave Jones
Having looked at the versions of debhelper in play, and the versions that introduced / fixed various bugs, my current reading of the situation is as follows: All current bionic and focal versions in release, updates, and backports (11.1.6, 12.10, and 13.5.2) will be producing packages where the ol

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-21 Thread Thomas Ward
Then this should be trivial to backport, if you need it backported waveform and you don't want to handle the actual backport uploads, I'll take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-21 Thread Paride Legovini
@teward: Mattia is right, at the moment only the -backports are affected, as the bug was introduced in Jammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@teward: I'm pretty sure that bug only affects -backports: according to the debian bug the commit introducing it is 6067bc2f, which was first available in debhelper 13.4, which is only in jammy and -backports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
tbf, I don't think this is actually *urgent* and can really just stay there for another week. ** Summary changed: - [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal + [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Oh, that's probably a good reason to update the backport indeed, that I've been procrastinating. Unfortunately at this time I'm quite busy so I wouldn't be able to do it before next Monday at the earliest. Personally I'm fine if somebody else take it and I'll later review the diff; I don't expect

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Thomas Ward
waveform: Paride: given this bug, wouldn't this be more suited for full SRU and rebuilds? I'm wondering whether this is truly a backportable case because this requires rebuild of all affected packages, and if anyone builds with debhelper in backports (which is NOT available in standard build envs

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Thomas Ward
Whoops looks like we had some collission in terms of assignments. Reassigning to waveform. Once this is looked at and looks OK at the Canonical level, then the Backports Team will take over backporting this. Keep in mind that since the original Backports process is mostly scrapped, the Backports

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Dave Jones
Hmm, good point. This change ought to be back-ported and the same set of packages rebuilt otherwise an LTS->LTS upgrade risks stopping vital services like dbus too. Assigning myself to have a look at this; looks like bionic and focal are only one minor version behind so a back-port shouldn't be hu

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Paride Legovini
** Description changed: Please backport debhelper (>= 13.6ubuntu1) to Bionic and Focal. Currently we have  debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1| bionic-backports | source, all  debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1| focal-backports | source, all Those versions are affected

[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Subscribing Dave Jones who looked at this for Jammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal To manage notifications abo