No. It's just waiting for an archive administrator to sync the packages
from Debian.
--
please sync current version of bcfg2/bcfg2-server packages from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196696
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Hi. Did i miss including some information the bug? I've added all of
the pertinent information to the description of this bug.
thanks..
-nld
--
please sync current version of bcfg2/bcfg2-server packages from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196696
You received this bug notificatio
ACKed.
--
please sync current version of bcfg2/bcfg2-server packages from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196696
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
--
please sync current version of bcfg2/bcfg2-server packages from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196696
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Summary changed:
- new version of bcfg2 has been released (FFe)
+ please sync current version of bcfg2/bcfg2-server packages from debian
unstable
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: bcfg2
Version 0.9.4 is getting pretty long in the tooth. A new stable release,
0.9.5.7 has b
