yesterday I opened the SRU request:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backintime/+bug/1976164
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime not launching because of
I saw that pkexec is dep. of policykit-1, a dep. of backintime so add a pkexec
dep. is not needed in SRU.
I prepared a Jammy vm and did a fast test of backintime from my ppa.
I saw that launch from icon as root crash, I found that is a pkexec bug with
wayland (now default), with xorg works correc
@fantu, yes: I do have pkexec installed:
michele@pc-michele:~$ apt list pkexec
Elencazione... Fatto
pkexec/jammy,now 0.105-33 amd64 [installato, automatico]
pkexec/jammy 0.105-33 i386
michele@pc-michele:~$
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Thanks for all details of your tests.
I did a very fast build for possible SRU of 1.3.2-0.1 in this another ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes2
But don't have additional debian/patches so should be the same of upstream ppa
(https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archi
@fantu, yes: if I didn't anyhting wrong, I currently have the fix package from
https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes
installed.
For your information: before your package, I had installed the fix package from
https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable
thanks for testing, after point 2 have you also installed the updated package,
right?
I tested 1.3.2-0.1 on debian unstable before upload on it and was working also
as root, I suppose related to one of other fixes (but I not checked in code
changed now if there are changes related to it), as wro
@fantonifabio: as a normal Ubuntu user, unaware of the official Ubuntu
dev/test/release lifecycle but eager to have this bothering bug finally
fixed, I have tested your fix at the best of my understanding as
follows:
1. sudo add-apt-repository ppa:fantonifabio/ubuntu-fixes
2. sudo apt update
3. cl
is in the ppa in the linked in my previous message (
https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes )
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime not la
if you describe how to access the "patched" backintime version, I will
give it a try this evening or tomorrow.
Peter
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime not laun
as wrote in comment 6 I think use 1.3.2-0.1 is better for have also few other
bugs less but I fear it would be difficult to have it accepted :(
So I prepared a build with only the minimal fix to make possible application
start: https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-fixes
http
backintime-qt 1.2.1-3 fails because of an incompatibility to python 3.10.
python 3.10 is part of Ubuntu 22.04.
Therefore my assumption: the version of backintime-qt contained in
Ubuntu 22.04 was never tested. It's simply not starting at all.
So I dont understand the statement, that in order to up
Thanks for providing this fix via the BIT PPA. I've had so many problems
with my system since the upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04, this was just one more
issue I had to spend time attempting to fix. Pretty disappointing that
Ubuntu, and thus derivatives, are now shipping with a bunch of broken
software and
The fix is in this commit:
https://github.com/bit-
team/backintime/commit/e1ae23ddc0b4229053e3e9c6c61adcb7f3d8e9b3
Which is the only essential difference in 1.3.2.
https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/compare/1.3.1...v1.3.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
@brain-murray thanks for reply, as linked above the diff is not big and
few other bugfix (of the upstream version released near one year ago but
included only in package with my recent NMU on debian) may be useful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
From the SRU team's perspective backporting the version of backintime in
Kinetic to Jammy would require a more thorough review as opposed to just
updating the package with the specific fix for this bug report. If it'd
be possible to cherry pick the specific fix, I'd recommend doing that.
--
You r
I join fantu and lastique in urging fix 1.3.2-0.1 to be ported to Ubuntu 22.04:
- because 22.04 is an LTS, bound to include a serious, hassle-free, powerful
and yet easy-to-use backup tool such as backintime-qt.
- because backintime-qt is far more feature-rich and flexible than the default
Ubunt
I think, 22.04 being an LTS release, must have a working backup
software.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime not launching because of python error
To manage not
Kinetic Kudu have now 1.3.2-0.1 that fix it but I think is good have it also in
22.04, different from version are not many, upstream changes from previous
version seems only few other fixes:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/599163832/backintime_1.2.1-3_1.3.2-0.1.diff.gz
** Changed in: backintime (
Thank you Ventusfahrer! Backintime has been my beloved backup tool for over a
decade and after upgrading to 22.04 I had been left kind of "orphan", unable to
create any new daily snapshots!
Fortunately this patch has made the trick, until the next Jammy sync!
--
You received this bug notificat
For those who can't wait for the official fix:
https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime not launching because o
unfortunately the 1.3.2-0.1 that fix it was uploaded on debian only now
and therefore not in time for Jammy sync request :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
Backintime no
** Description changed:
- Expectations: App launches and create an application windows.
+ Expectation: App launches and create an application window.
What happens: App does not launch.
Terminal output:
backintime-qt
Traceback (most recent call last):
- File "/usr/share/backintime/qt/a
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: backintime (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970090
Title:
23 matches
Mail list logo