[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2009-01-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ufw - 0.26-0ubuntu1 --- ufw (0.26-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low * new upstream release, which fixes: - formatting of dpkg output incorrect on upgrades (LP: #300726) - new REJECT functionality (LP: #197322) - ufw shouldn't flush built-in

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2009-01-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thanks hendrik for your work on this. The hesitation in adding this feature was because ufw strives to be uncomplicated, and the difference between iptables DROP and REJECT is a subtlety that might have made things too complicated. That said, I believe it should be a part of ufw, and I have committ

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-12-31 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) -- ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-10-19 Thread hendrik
I would probably be able to produce another patch for ufw, init-script and the manpage, however, I am interested in the reason for possibly not supporting this in ufw. I would really like to use ufw some more; not being able to reject, not drop, traffic though can make problem-solving rather time-

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-09-28 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Marking as triaged since the patch won't apply anymore. I'm still not sure this will be supported in ufw. ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic https://bugs

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-03-09 Thread Jamie Strandboge
This may not be suitable for Hardy, but I have added a branch based on the changes submitted. Still need to update the test cases for decline/REJECT regressions. ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic https://bugs.la

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-03-06 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report the bug and submit a patch. This should get integrated into the next version of ufw. ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jamie-strandboge) Status: New => In Progress -- ufw should be able to

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-03-01 Thread hendrik
This patch against the uncompressed manpage ufw.8 (Version: 0.13) adds the 'reject' option to the manpage, including two examples of its use. ** Attachment added: "Patch against /usr/share/man/man8/ufw.8" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12342026/ufw.8.patch -- ufw should be able to add rules re

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-03-01 Thread hendrik
This patch against /etc/init.d/ufw (Version: 0.13) modifies the init- script to allow a default policy of 'reject' for INPUT, OUTPUT or FORWARD. As REJECT is not a built-in target, the default policy for the table is set to DROP, but all traffic is rejected by two catch-all rules at the bottom of

[Bug 197322] Re: ufw should be able to add rules rejecting traffic

2008-03-01 Thread hendrik
This patch against /usr/sbin/ufw (Version: 0.13) adds the options to specify 'reject' in a rule, specify 'reject' to delete a rule and adds the possibility to specify 'reject' as the default policy for INPUT, OUTPUT or FORWARD. TCP is rejected via '--with-reject tcp-reset', all others protocols v