[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gnudatalanguage - 1.0.1-3maysync1 --- gnudatalanguage (1.0.1-3maysync1) kinetic; urgency=medium * debian/patches/Increase-test_tic_toc-tolerance.patch: Import Debian patch to increase tolerance used in test_tic_toc (LP: #1973377). -- Nick Rosb

[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-19 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: gnudatalanguage (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973377 Title: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance To man

[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-19 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you, LGTM and passes a local test build. I've fixed up a trailing whitespace in the "Origin:" DEP-3 patch header and adopted your special "1.0.1-3willsync1" version string slightly: We need a version that does not contain the word "ubuntu", so it can be auto-synced once the committed patch i

[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-16 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Patch added: "gnudatalanguage-lp-1973377.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnudatalanguage/+bug/1973377/+attachment/5590164/+files/gnudatalanguage-lp-1973377.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnudatalanguage (Debian) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnudatalanguage (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19

[Bug 1973377] Re: gnudatalanguage: small test_tic_toc tolerance

2022-05-13 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This test is flaky on amd64 autopkgtest infrastructure too [1]. The staged change at [2] might help some, but there have been instances where the error percentage is higher than 2% [3]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/gnudatalanguage/kinetic/amd64 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-a