** Changed in: motion (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #461763
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461763
** Also affects: motion (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461763
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://
Copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Fixed in Intrepid.
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
cool!
--- On Thu, 7/31/08, mouz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: mouz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Bug 198292] Re: Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2008, 3:19 PM
I tested the mvo's version in hardy-proposed (3.2.9-1ubuntu1)
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I tested the mvo's version in hardy-proposed (3.2.9-1ubuntu1) and found
that it fixes the bug.
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:48:33AM -, TJ wrote:
> Although adding CDBS on its own may not be a reason for an SRU, I'd
> suggest it *is* if it is needed to apply patches to the original source
> when the package currently has *no* patch system at all, and source-code
> patches need to be applied
@Martin:
Did not test a Gutsy upgrade. Tested hardy-proposed clean install to
hardy (x86_64).
The proposed 'fix' of adding the -b (--background) switch to start-stop-
daemon in /etc/init.d/motion for its 'start' case will only force the
daemon to background the motion shell process - it doesn't d
TJ, for the purpose of driving forward this bug fix, did you test that
the version currently in hardy-proposed works for gutsy upgrades? If
that's the case, we should move it to hardy-updates and start another
SRU for the remaining problems you noticed.
If the "remaining problems" you had still ap
The revised package appears to still have problems.
However, there is a newer upstream version available. I've taken the
opportunity to repackage and bug-fix it. It is available from my PPA for
Intrepid, Hardy, Gutsy and Feisty:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/intuitivenipple/ubuntu
motion (3.2.10.1-0u
Given that the original bug report was about an upgrade from 7.10, I
don't think the test case here is correct because it only tests upgrades
from the hardy to the hardy-proposed version, not from the gutsy to the
hardy-proposed version. Given that there are reports that the hardy
->hardy-proposed
Yeah, stepan, your fix would work just fine, but I'd much rather motion
start as its own user. From a security standpoint, it just makes sense.
I customized the init script on my install for motion, and it more or
less does what mouz's patches do, so it wouldn't be appropriate for SRU.
In other w
** Tags added: hw-specific
** Tags removed: gutsy2hardy
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
Michael Vogt's fix is a quick-and-dirty hack which I think is good,
because:
- it is the minimal solution as required for SRU fixes
- it resembles the (agreed: dirty) fix done in upstream future versions and
queued for Intrepid.
Geoff Hickey mentions an upgrade problem (3.2.9-1 to Michael Vogt's
I install ubuntu 8.04 from scratch and I realized that motion cannot
create pid file because it run with user "motion" not root so it has not
the privilegies to create a file in directory /var/run.
So I modified the init script adding the following line before to start
the daemon:
touch $PIDFILE
I grabbed 3.2.9-1ubuntu1 from hardy-proposed, but I ran into a couple of
problems.
First, if I install it after purging the old version (3.2.9-1), it works
ok, except that it still fails to create a PID file in /var/run. I'm not
sure why. But the process does daemonize and I verified that it's
wor
Accepted motion/3.2.9-1ubuntu1 into hardy-proposed, please test.
** Tags added: verification-needed
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification be
I updated the test case to the best of my knowledge, I don't have the
required hardware but I think its enough to plug the webcam in.
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thanks for the responses.
I uploaded a fix for this a couple of days ago, but failed to set the
bugreport to fix commited (sorry for that). It was waiting in the
unapproved queue since. I attach the debdiff for the upload now.
@Cody: Thanks for reviewing the verification instructions, those are
i
Hello,
This bug report requires further work before it can be approved for a
stable release update.
1. The patch must only make the minimal changes necessary to fix the bugs that
meet the SRU criteria. So, for example you won't bump the standards version.
2. You don't need to list the bug number
Attached is the same debdiff, but this time with a more appropriate
version number (3.2.9-1ubuntu0.1). For the development release I will
not supply a debdiff. The bug is fixed upstream in the versions
concerned (Debian bug 461763).
** Attachment added: "debdiff for motion 3.2.9-1"
http://laun
I updated motion for this bug. Attached is the debdiff. When this is
applied, motion will by default daemonize. That way an upgrade won't be
halted anymore.
Changelog:
motion (3.2.9-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* motion now starts in daemon mode (LP: #198292)
* creation of PID file now succe
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu)
Target: ubuntu-8.04.1 => None
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
This bug is closely related to #235599, where the question is raised
whether motion should start as a server on startup without telling the
user.
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Subscribing motu-sru for their approval.
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Description changed:
Situation: Upgrading from 7.10 to A5 with motion package installed.
motion starts executing during upgrade and upgrade process halts until
motion is killed.
+
+ TEST CASE:
+ 1. install hardy
+ 2. get a supported webcame that shows as /dev/video0
+ 3. run "sudo ap
This borked my upgrade as well on a HP Pavillion dv2410us laptop with
built-in webcam.
I'd suggest that the upgrade check first and refuse to install if this
package is installed.
The upgrade manager issue a warning about the system being potentially
unstable and it attempting to roll back, just
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu Hardy)
Target: None => ubuntu-8.04.1
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
>From one of the duplicates:
-
Geoff Hickey:
I ran into this also. You can reproduce it without running an upgrade though:
just install motion with a webcam plugged in. If the default settings in the
new /etc/motion.conf script installed with the package will work with the
webcam, the proces
>From the attached main.log:
2008-04-25 08:53:43,580 WARNING no activity on terminal for 240 seconds
(Configuring motion)
2008-04-25 09:29:01,568 ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'motion':
'subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Interrupt)
It was indeed running for a while wi
I also had to kill motion - it was in a continuous loop of grabbing
pictures from the web cam. Once I killed it the dist-upgrade from 7.10
to 8.04 seems to have gone OK. But I'm just going to reboot now...
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You receiv
It happens too on 8.04 downloading and installing it via synaptic.
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Hardy upgrade - motion halts upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
After killing motion, the process goes on normally then the running
wine-doors reports an error and quits, right after that and after
update-initramfs, the upgrade reports an "error where encountered while
processing: motion" and stalls at "IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file
descriptor". I waited and then
Thanks for reporting this bug.
To help diagnose the problem please attach the files in the directory
/var/log/dist-upgrade/
Specifically:
* main.log
* apt.log
* term.log
Thanks!
** Changed in: motion (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => motion
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Hardy upgra
36 matches
Mail list logo
