Corrected package assignment.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Also affects: ubufox (Ubuntu)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 208722 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208722
not an ubufox issue. there should be duplicate reported for apturl
already.
** Also affects: apturl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status:
This bug report should be against the live cd (desktop cd) as it really
has nothing to do with mozilla in anyway. The same can be said about any
package in multiverse repos.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: ubufox = ubiquity
--
can not find flashplugin-nonfree
As i recall you can choose your repos during installation of Ubuntu. Is
this not the case anymore?
--
can not find flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205626
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
My original bug report was for booting from the LiveCD and there was
no (obvious) request to set the source repos. Obviously I could
change it manually, but this bug was from the perspective of new user.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:51 PM, John Vivirito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As i recall you
I also encountered this and was initially baffled. I think it would be a
good idea if the user is either informed that the repositories are not
enabled, or better, give the user an option to enable the repositories.
--
can not find flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205626
You
Thanks for your bug report.
The second issue is already being worked on, see bug #144042.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
can not find flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205626
You received this bug notification because you are a
Even with the second issue resolved, there would still be confusion
from the user as to how to process. Is there a recommended approach
to address the first?
Thanks.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your bug report.
The second
