[Bug 2059155] Re: nauty FTBFS on armhf

2024-09-10 Thread Doug Torrance
** Changed in: nauty (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059155 Title: nauty FTBFS on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: http

[Bug 2059155] Re: nauty FTBFS on armhf

2024-04-03 Thread Doug Torrance
This is fixed in nauty 2.8.8+ds-5, which I just uploaded to Debian unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059155 Title: nauty FTBFS on armhf To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2059155] Re: nauty FTBFS on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Pushkar Kulkarni
From a scan, it looks like fseek() and ftell() are the only two largefile functions used by nauty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059155 Title: nauty FTBFS on armhf To manage notifi

[Bug 2059155] Re: nauty FTBFS on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Pushkar Kulkarni
nauty.h defines _FILE_OFFSET_BITS to 0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059155 Title: nauty FTBFS on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub

[Bug 2059155] Re: nauty FTBFS on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Pushkar Kulkarni
"_TIME_BITS=64 can be defined only when _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is also defined." [1] [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Feature-Test- Macros.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad