[Bug 2061990] Re: Please RM armhf binaries

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
We now have some better confidence that the failure is purely test-suite based, and shouldn't affect the operation of the binary itself. Marking won't fix and leaving the armhf tests disabled until such time as they can be fixed properly (or removed). ** Changed in: mtd-utils (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2061990] Re: Please RM armhf binaries

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
Potentially affected images: As noted above this potentially affects *any* armhf image with boot artifacts that require flashing (that are deb based). This potentially affects our older Pi server armhf images (which, although they don't use mtd-utils, do use flash-kernel). However, we're not

[Bug 2061990] Re: Please RM armhf binaries

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
$ reverse-depends src:mtd-utils Reverse-Recommends == * 0x [armhf](for mtd-utils) * python3-binwalk (for mtd-utils) Reverse-Depends === * flash-kernel [arm64 armhf](for mtd-utils) Packages without architectures listed are

[Bug 2061990] Re: Please RM armhf binaries

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
Additional context: flash-kernel has several methods of "flashing" boot artifacts (bootloaders, kernel, initrd, etc.) on various boards. Flashing may actually mean flashing EEPROM (typically done via some other utility, in many cases mtd-utils -- mtd incidentally is "Memory Technology Device",