** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-207400 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back
Hi there,
The bug description only mentioned the situation with GCC. I wonder what
the story is with other toolchains like Clang and/or other LLVM-based
compilers (e.g. rustc/ldc/julia etc)? Some of the toolchains do support
the `-mbacktrace`-like option on s390x, while the rest do not allow you
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance:
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove
