** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Steve has been unavailable unfortunately. In his absence, I'm inclined
to follow my opinion in the previous comment. Third party software is
expected to be rebuilt against the soname used in 24.04, since we do not
provide ABI compatibility across releases.
If the soname does actually go back upstr
Sorry Steve, I should have been more specific. Assuming there is no
change in Debian's status, do you think it's appropriate for Ubuntu to
create a compat symlink in the meantime, and if so, appropriate for SRU
to 24.04?
Personally I'm inclined to say that it doesn't make sense if the soname
ends
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:08:42PM -, Robie Basak wrote:
> @Steve could you comment please?
According to the Debian maintainer in the changelog:
- Perform a SONAME bump to avoid stomping on upstream SONAME. Once and if
the new symbols are accepted by upstream then we can merge that
@Steve could you comment please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Hi,
For me there was a problem which slipped through a release, ok that's
unfortunate, but now I would naively expect we try to make it less
intrusive to users who have been caught in this. (IMO I am not sure on
Debian side it was a good idea to push a soname change + package name
change which had
> Only because Ubuntu is a random snapshot of Debian testing [...]
Ubuntu packages are pulled from unstable, not testing.
> I totally disagree with "something needs to be rebuilt in order to
pick up the changes".
This is how the package was released in noble. It does make sense to
expect third p
** Tags added: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
I totally disagree with "something needs to be rebuilt in order to pick
up the changes". The Debian maintainer made clear, that the change in
SONAME is temporary for Debian testing and would never make it into the
next Debian release.
Only because Ubuntu is a random snapshot of Debian testing, it
Thanks for providing additional information.
Let me take a step back and see if I understood the problem.
- Oracle Instance Client links against libaio.so.1
- As part of the time_t 64-bit transition on Noble, we renamed several
of our libraries and appended "t64" to their names.
- Debian decide
The Debian Maintainer said[1]:
"In the Debian context this was intended to be a temporary
non-intrusive solution that would not stomp over upstream, until this
had been agreed with them. My intention has always been to revert the
local SONAME bump before the next Debian release. Ubuntu will have t
** Changed in: libaio (Debian)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
To manage notification
** Changed in: libaio (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
To manage notifications
** Also affects: libaio (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072471
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Ti
For me adding the symlink will not create issues with the SONAME bump,
old binaries (ie which were not relinked) will use libaio.so.1 while
newly linked binaries will use the new soname libaio.so.1t64 as the
package maintainers expects.
I have re-started the conversation in https://bugs.debian.org
Hello and thanks for this bug report. The SONAME bump has been done
deliberately, see this changelog entry (from version 0.3.113-6):
- Perform a SONAME bump to avoid stomping on upstream SONAME. Once and if
the new symbols are accepted by upstream then we can merge that back
into libaio.so.1 a
Actually it's not needed in the udeb package, but in the normal
libaio1t64 package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067501
Title:
Ubuntu noble is missing libaio.so.1 compat symlink
T
17 matches
Mail list logo
