[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-07-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-apfs-rw - 0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1 --- linux-apfs-rw (0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1) jammy; urgency=medium * Rebuild in the jammy environment and fix breakage with 5.15 (LP: #2069573): - 0010-fix-breakage-with-5.15-kernel.patch -- Andrea Righi

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-07-11 Thread Paolo Pisati
$ dkms status linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1, 5.15.0-113-generic, x86_64: installed linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1, 6.8.0-38-generic, x86_64: installed GA: $ lsmod | grep apfs apfs 217088 0 HWE: $ lsmod | grep apfs apfs 253952 0 builds, install

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-07-05 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello Andrea, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-apfs-rw into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-apfs- rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-07-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: linux-apfs-rw (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069573

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-07-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: linux-apfs-rw (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069573

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-26 Thread Robie Basak
I understand that I could just do this myself but it feels like every time I look at an HWE backport fix this isn't in the Test Plan, so I'm pushing back now to get this done properly from the beginning. That way there will be less effort for everyone at a time that the SRU queues are quite large

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-26 Thread Robie Basak
Please amend the Test Plan to make it clear that testing both the GA and HWE kernels is required. I expect to see this in the Test Plan for every HWE backport fix (and if it's not required then an explanation as to why). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-17 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069573 Title: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-17 Thread Andrea Righi
** Patch added: "jammy-backport-apfs.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-apfs-rw/+bug/2069573/+attachment/5790208/+files/jammy-backport-apfs.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-17 Thread Andrea Righi
Test plan with the new apfs dkms: - build test with hwe kernel 6.8 (lowlatency): apfs.ko: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - No original module exists within this kernel - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.0-35-lowlatency/updates/dkms/ - build test

[Bug 2069573] Re: apfs-dkms FTBS with the kernel 6.8 in jammy

2024-06-17 Thread Andrea Righi
** Description changed: [Impact] /var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0+git20220214+ds-2ubuntu2~22.04.3/build/apfs.h:978:14: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__getblk_gfp’; did you mean ‘sb_getblk_gfp’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] - 978 | bh =