mapreri: Tracked in Debian as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074383 - any comments we need to have can be
there instead of on this backport bug. (The backport is now Fix
Released in the system as it's published in the archives)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
just remember that in Debian alternative build-depends are count *only*
in backports, meaning that the first alternative should be what's in
actual use in sid at the time.
I recommend you do have a deeper look at qtbase5-dev, as you said it's
very odd for it to not work in xca's case.
--
You
mapreri: qtbase5-dev a while ago was attempted but DID NOT pull in all
the dependencies, which was odd. Same thing also didn't provide the
proper libs (for some reason) with the upstream build system changes,
which I never had a chance to circle back to addressing.
This is in my list of things
FWIW, this is the change that Thomas mentions:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca/-/commit/bbce8d50361bd0593ba4be88c3442fcc0527a400
I'm a bit confused: why are you referencing an explicit library package
in build-dep instead of using a -dev package (in this case,
qtbase5-dev)?
In any case, go
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361
Title:
[BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go
