[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2010-02-12 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Closing bug: from Lucid onwards the dictionary is provided by hunspell-ro which is generated from the openoffice.org-dictionary source package. The hunspell-ro dictionary has comma-bellow diacritics. ** Changed in: myspell-ro (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- Romanian

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-16 Thread rs
The release numbering is imposed by aspell.net in the format X.Y for major releases and X.Y.Z for minor releases. It is a pretty standard numbering scheme, most projects are using it. Based on this version, a number of Unix and Linux distributions are driving automatic updates. Unfortunately, we

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-16 Thread Alexandru Szasz
Guys, users don't care about versioning, they just need the dictionary with the most words and the correct writing scheme. There is no sense in distributing the wrong cedilla version, as you all know there is a law that says we should use the correct comma version in official writings, so I see no

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-16 Thread Jani Monoses
Let's separate the issues: 1)users do not care about versions but that is no explanation or excuse for gratuitously picking a version that is inferior to the one used with a package with the same name. Developers and packagers care about versions because that is how things work sanely. It is a

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread rs
The dictionary distributed by Ubuntu is at least two years behind. Move to Fedora, or install OpenOffice.org and Firefox on Windows XP. -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Jani Monoses
rs (Lucian Constantin): you are very constructive as always. If you have no solution to offer besides childish remarks go and troll somewhere else. -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread rs
A solution has been available for at least one year from aspell.net. Another one is distributed in the Romanian Firefox build from mozilla.org. You can also get a version of the dictionary from OpenOffice.org website. Ubuntu developer Jani Monose was informed about this solution a long time ago,

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Break it up or take it outside :) Jani: no reason to root Lucian out, we who know him from other groups, know his email address. rs: email me in private with details (I really have no idea about myspell-ro/aspell/hunspell or other *spells) and I'll try to submit an updated version. --

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Jani Monoses
Lucian, something just being available is not a solution in itself. It needs a normal version number to allow easy upgrade of the existing one (last time I looked it did not have one), makes sure it does not break anything - the current dictionaries use comma not cedilla, etc. It is not my ego

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread rs
Also take a look at bugs 240048 and 240050. According to the submission dates, Ubuntu developers have been informed a log time ago regarding solutions to this specific problem. The competitive picture in this moment is very bad for Ubuntu. Firefox and OpenOffice.org are distributing correct

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread rs
I find Jani Monose's comments patronizing as always, no need to answer! Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: email me in private with details As I said, bugs 240048 and 240050 have all the necessary information. All that needs to be done is to get the official dictionaries from aspell.net and

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Alexandru Szasz
Guys, this seems like a thing to do not to talk about, what's blocking this ? -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Adi Roiban
The only problem is the versioning number? Switching to Fedora or Win XP is not a proper solution for this problem. We all love the restricred driver manager and we are willing to do all kind of weird sacrifices to have it running on our computers ;) Can we just make a fork and create a

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Jani Monoses
Adi, it is exactly the problems of the versioning scheme and of the uncertainty of how two separate dictionaries work is why I do not consider that 'a solution has been available'. It is not just a matter of uploading a package. Please discuss it on the mailing list, split the problem in separate

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread rs
Adi, it is exactly the problems of the versioning scheme and of the uncertainty of how two separate dictionaries work is why I do not consider that 'a solution has been available' What dictionaries? Why are using a plural form? Are there more than one? If I say Fedora once more, I'll be

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Adi Roiban
As can not tell if the version number is good or bad but as I can see the aspell-ro was updated in Jaunty to the latest version. I am confident we could find a solution for this problem. I will try to gather more knowledge about spellcheckers and how to work and try to come with a solution. I

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-15 Thread Jani Monoses
Lucian: yes there are two dictionaries, one with comma the other with cedilla Adi: there existed a mysepll-ro (not talking about aspell) on the openoffice l10n site. It used the 2005 versioning and was made made by Secarica AFAICR . It was in gentoo. I added it to Ubuntu in 2007. Then

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2009-02-08 Thread Adi Roiban
** Changed in: myspell-ro (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Romanian Localization (ubuntu-l10n-ro) -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2008-12-09 Thread Daniel T Chen
** Changed in: myspell-ro (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Triaged ** Tags added: patch -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2008-04-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
** Attachment added: myspell-ro_20070502.0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13262436/myspell-ro_20070502.0ubuntu2.debdiff -- Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214193 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 214193] Re: Romanian spell-check dictionary uses incorect diacritics

2008-04-08 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
Note that this fix is compatible (actually, orthogonal) to that in bug #213990 — if the dictionary is updated it will apply of course to both package versions. However, both debdiffs contain the addition of a simple patch system, so only one should be used; for the other it's enough to copy the