Doesn't debdelta[1] just do that?
[1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/debdelta
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Could Google's Courgette be used here?
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/07/smaller-is-faster-and-safer-too.html
As far as I understand, it would be applicable here, no?
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Confirmed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) = (unassigned)
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a
If the diffs are for the installed files, then I don't see why that wouldn't
work.
However, it seems that Fedora's Presto utilizes an rpm utility, which is making
me doubt if it is flexible enough to adapt it to deb without rewriting major
parts of the code.
If it isn't flexible enough, there
fedora is working on a similar project https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/presto
This doesn't require you to have a cache of the downloaded rpms but just the
installed files.
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I thought that the binary patches are for the actually installed files
in /usr, so that the cache isn't needed at all.
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
It would fit well with the goals already set for Jaunty (that is, fast
boot times, faster system performance, blurring of the line between off-
and online apps).
Only, I don't think that a binary diff will work (especially not for
people like me who don't have all the hard disk space in the
It's really a shame that Ubuntu still doesn't have this feature. Debian
at least has apt indexes, which saves a lot of time updating the package
lists. Just think about the poor users all over the world on low-
bandwidth connections. Please make this a higher priority and get it
implemented
Can anyone tell me why this is still unimplemented? It's 2 years now...
:F
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: apt (Baltix)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This bug is still present in Hardy. Made a fresh install of Hardy
yesterday : had to download 180Mo of update. How much would binary
update decrease size ? Lowering the update size to ~10 Mo ? This is a
__very__ interesting feature.
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
Apt-sync should do the trick : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/apt-sync
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
Binary patch updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Bug 54029 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Binary patch updating
https://launchpad.net/bugs/21837
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
14 matches
Mail list logo
