Re: [Bug 230129] Re: pm-utils documentation problems

2009-02-01 Thread hyperair
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 17:27 +, DaveAbrahams wrote: > How does explaining that in this ticket amount to fixing the problem? > I'm saying it's fixed prior to me posting, not that I've fixed it. -- Chow Loong Jin -- pm-utils documentation problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230129 You re

Re: [Bug 230129] Re: pm-utils documentation problems

2009-02-01 Thread DaveAbrahams
How does explaining that in this ticket amount to fixing the problem? Sent from my iPhone On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:23 AM, hyperair wrote: > I'm looking at Intrepid's pm-utils package here, and it seems that > #3 is > fixed. In #1, by "similarly named" it means that the name is the > same, > e

[Bug 230129] Re: pm-utils documentation problems

2009-02-01 Thread hyperair
I'm looking at Intrepid's pm-utils package here, and it seems that #3 is fixed. In #1, by "similarly named" it means that the name is the same, even if the number is not. As you should know, only numbered hooks are called. As for #2, I've grep'd the source for DISPLAY_QUIRK and the only instance o