I'm not sure by what mechanism this has been fixed, but testing with
nss_wins + libsmbclient in precise, I can no longer reproduce a crash
due to -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions.
According to the build log at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:3.6.3-1ubuntu1/+build/3228461/+files
I'm not sure by what mechanism this has been fixed, but testing with
nss_wins + libsmbclient in precise, I can no longer reproduce a crash
due to -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions.
According to the build log at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:3.6.3-1ubuntu1/+build/3228461/+files
Upstream doesn't impose anything. ubuntu has made the choice to keep
that setting via the Dpkg::Vendor infrastructure. Thus marking it as
wontfix for dpkg.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Upstream doesn't impose anything. ubuntu has made the choice to keep
that setting via the Dpkg::Vendor infrastructure. Thus marking it as
wontfix for dpkg.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Thank you for the patch, however,based on cjwatson's comments above, I'm
rejecting this patch. Please feel free to remove the patch-rejected tag
if you have a new patch that needs to be reviewed.
** Tags added: patch-rejected
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
Thank you for the patch, however,based on cjwatson's comments above, I'm
rejecting this patch. Please feel free to remove the patch-rejected tag
if you have a new patch that needs to be reviewed.
** Tags added: patch-rejected
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Given the last comment, shouldn't this be marked as a duplicate of
#225741, with that bug having tasks added for krb5, cupsys, and net-
snmp-config? (This also brings up the point that those libraries should
use pkg-config instead of their own -config application.)
--
Please apply upstream patch
Given the last comment, shouldn't this be marked as a duplicate of
#225741, with that bug having tasks added for krb5, cupsys, and net-
snmp-config? (This also brings up the point that those libraries should
use pkg-config instead of their own -config application.)
--
Please apply upstream patch
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for your comment. I got two points from your message.
1. Using linker flag -Bsymbolic-functions for building library is your
policy.
Certainly it's not bad idea. It makes shared libraries more robust, so it
seems to be good manner indeed.
(But ... I wonder why not -Bsymbolic instead of
Thanks for your comment. I got two points from your message.
1. Using linker flag -Bsymbolic-functions for building library is your
policy.
Certainly it's not bad idea. It makes shared libraries more robust, so it
seems to be good manner indeed.
(But ... I wonder why not -Bsymbolic instead of
** Attachment added: dpkg.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14708110/dpkg.patch
--
Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
