** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
This bug was fixed in the package clamav - 0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~feisty3
---
clamav (0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~feisty3) feisty-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: fix possible invalid memory access
* added 27_petite.c.dpatch: (LP: #238575)
- libclamav/petite.c: fix possible invalid mem
This bug was fixed in the package clamav - 0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~gutsy3
---
clamav (0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~gutsy3) gutsy-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: fix possible invalid memory access
* added 27_petite.c.dpatch: (LP: #238575)
- libclamav/petite.c: fix possible invalid memory
This bug was fixed in the package clamav - 0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1ubuntu0.1
---
clamav (0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1ubuntu0.1) hardy-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: fix possible invalid memory access
* added 27_petite.c.dpatch: (LP: #238575)
- libclamav/petite.c: fix possible invalid m
Intrepid was fixed with the sync of 0.93.1
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I've fixed up all the changelog entries to follow a more regular format,
e.g.:
* SECURITY UPDATE: fix possible invalid memory access
* added 27_petite.c.dpatch: (LP: #238575)
- libclamav/petite.c: fix possible invalid memory access
* References
CVE-2008-2713
(And added the now-assi
ok
in case they don't I can redo the diff
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
I think they can just edit it before they upload it.
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Does this means That I should redo the diff with the change ??
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
I would suggest changing the dapper revision from dapper3 to
dapper2ubuntu1 to be consistent with the others.
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
I've also tested the hardy version on my test mail server with clamsmtp.
The patch is identical (except the revision number) for all of them, so
I think they are all good to go.
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this b
And this is for hardy
Applies, builds, installs and works fine
** Attachment added: "hardy.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15160803/hardy.debdiff
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification b
This is the debdiff fixed with the 00list edited to include the patch
all builds, installs and works fine
** Attachment added: "gutsy.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15158439/gutsy.debdiff
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Patch applied fine builded with pbuilder all fine
installed and tested all working fine
** Attachment added: "dapper.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15158296/dapper.debdiff
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You recei
Diff for gutsy applies fine
builded with pbuild and installed fine
tested all working fine
All checked even 00list ;)
** Attachment added: "feisty.debdif"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15157057/feisty.debdif
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchp
Gutsy debdiff missing the 00list entry for the new patch ...
working on it
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Diff for gutsy applies fine
builded with pbuild and installed fine
tested all working fine
** Attachment added: "Gutsy DebDiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15153417/gutsy.debdiff
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You re
For Intrepid, we should just wait and get 0.93.1 from Debian when they
have it.
** This bug has been flagged as a security issue
--
Possible invalid memory access in versions before 0.93.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Attached diff for 0.92.1
** Attachment added: "Diff for fix"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15148171/petite.patch
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assigne
19 matches
Mail list logo
