[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2017-03-08 Thread era
I can't repro that in Xenial. The error message I get comes from the ssmtp sendmail: cannot open mail:25 If you can run strace mpack path/to/file ran...@example.com we could at least see what's wrong. Also, make sure your PATH is correct. Out of the box on Ubuntu, ssmtp installs /usr/sbin/sendm

[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2017-03-08 Thread Frank van der Hulst
I've just run into this, except that I do have ssmtp installed. System is a raspberry Pi running raspbian Linux pi3 4.4.50-v7+ #970 SMP Mon Feb 20 19:18:29 GMT 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux mpack -o ... works fine. mpack ... [file] [emailaddress] fails with "execv: No such file or directory" sudo mpack .

[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2013-11-13 Thread era
I can speculate on why the package maintainer has opted for a weaker dependency, but if you would like to see this fixed, forwarding this bug upstream would seem like a reasonable first step. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mpack;dist=unstable -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2013-11-13 Thread flickerfly
Also: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 12.10 Release:12.10 Codename: quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2406

[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2013-11-13 Thread flickerfly
era, As I understand the documentation, this isn't an opinion thing. If the package does not operate without the other package, it is a depend, not a recommend. Below is my source for this information. If I misunderstand you, please correct or tell me how to use this package without the recommended

[Bug 240617] Re: mpack depends on execv from ssmtp

2012-03-26 Thread era
The package Suggests: mail-transport-agent. Perhaps the dependency could reasonably be upgraded to Recommends: but that is a matter of detailed opinion. The dependency declaration is there, and by policy, it is the user's choice whether or not to install the suggested package. Thus, I am setting