** Changed in: glib
Importance: Unknown = Medium
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
when switching terminal (ctrl + alt + f1)
$ umask
0002
in gnome-terminal:
$ umask
0022
checked:
- login.defs
- profile/.profile
- .basrc
using libpam-umask for the settings.
nautilus does not obey the umask either.
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
I am not sure this also related bug on this case or not. Here i make the
files on my dekstop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l Desktop/
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 2 lutfi Domain Users 4096 2008-09-03 04:56 directory
-rw-rw-r-- 1 lutfi Domain Users0 2008-09-03 04:56 file
I am use umask 0002 on
Copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
there is a new version in intrepid which fixes the issue
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi. I'm also want to try this update. But i need individual package
name. Could you tell me what packages name i have to install?
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a
Martin, I have just tested it and it works great. Thanks a lot to
everybody involved for fixing it.
BTW, will this be distributed via the regular security updates or do I
need to enable the proposed updates to everyone affected by this bug?
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask
Hi Petr,
Petr Stehlik [2008-08-13 22:24 -]:
Martin, I have just tested it and it works great. Thanks a lot to
everybody involved for fixing it.
Thanks!
BTW, will this be distributed via the regular security updates or do I
need to enable the proposed updates to everyone affected by this
seems to have been accepted in ubuntu updates. Many thanks for solving
the bug !
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: glib
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this
** Attachment added: debdiff for the stable update
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16636247/glib.debdiff
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Description changed:
This affects Ubuntu Hardy (8.04)
To replicate this bug, set umask in /etc/profile to something *less*
restrictive than the default 022. I'm trying to use 002 in order to have users
create group writeable files in an office collaboration environment. Log out
and in
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags added:
Thanks,
I've enabled the proposed repositories and it works well for me now.
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
You can add the following line to your sources.list if you want a
patched version:
deb http://backports.openoffice.nl hardy-openoffice glib2.0
Packages is this repository can be gpg authenticated. The key that is being
used for signing the packages is [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can enter this key
installing non official packages can be a security issue, create other
bugs and break next official updates so I would recommend users to wait
for an official update rather than adding random apt sources
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
Thanks Wouter! even if I actually ended up rebuilding the glib package
from source packages on my own.
Sebastien Bacher of course, but for the people who actually need this
feature and can't wait another couple of months/years for ubuntu
maintainers 1) get interested in fixing the bug 2)
Hi,
installing non official packages can be a security issue, create other
bugs and break next official updates so I would recommend users to wait
for an official update rather than adding random apt sources
Fine, let's just wait some more time until someone does something some
time soon. If
Hello,
Ok so I am in the exact same situation as Petr Stehlik. I just managed
to convert a whole family from windows media center to ubuntu hardy, and
they need a big shared directory where all users in the same group
users may share stuff (pictures, music, and so on). Umask in
/etc/profile is
those comments are not really constructive, there is just lot of bugs
and not a lot of users who have issues to the umasks not correctly being
set so the bug is somewhat not really noticed by people working on those
applications, I've added a comment upstream asking if they can review
the
I changed my desktop environment because of this bug. Gnome has had problems
with umask for years. The only reasons, for such a basic bug still being an
issue, can be really bad coders or sabotage. I am so annoyed by this kind of
bugs!
Sorry for ranting but it took me a whole day. I would also
Another vote for getting this bug fixed ASAP.. It's quite a big deal for
us as we are essentially unable to use Nautilus to work with shared
folders..
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug
Sebastien, do you really want more people to open the same bug to
increase priority of this? It is really a problem for many people - for
example imagine two (or more) users sharing the same computer - they
can't even sort out photos or music or anything (if one creates a folder
with common files
discussing the settings if of no use, the issue has been confirmed and
is waiting for an upstream comment on the change, adding noise to the
bug will not make it be fixed quickly if the issue is just that people
are busy, you can try to comment on bugzilla though
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
I agree with Valentijn Sessink. This bug should get a higher priority.
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I'm a bit confused by your comment; setting importance to low seems to imply
that a fix will be in the next Gnome - which means Ubuntu 8.10. Or am I
mistaken here?
This bug is too important for that: network users should be able to rely on the
correct rights for their new directories - you
I agree that this bug should have a slightly higher priority: it's also
a regression from previously correct behaviour. We are in an office
environment where collaboration and sharing files over the network are
core to our functioning. Since upgrading from Feisty (7.04), we're
having problems
the importance doesn't determine the version where it'll be fixed and
it's low because you are the only one who opened a bug about the issue
so far so it doesn't seem to a priority for users, the bug also maybe
lacks an explanation of why that should be considered as an important
issue, describing
My usage scenario: A server contains a directory owned by group
'collab', which is group writeable and has the setgid bit set. This
means that all new directories created underneath it will also be owned
by group 'collab'. The server is set up with accounts for users whose
desktop systems
right, that makes sense and I think the issue should be fixed to hardy,
I would like to get upstream to comment on the code change before having
it used for a stable update though
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
thank you for your bug report, no need to report upstream bugs on
launchpad though
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gio-standalone = glib2.0
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #535124
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535124
** Also affects: glib via
** Changed in: glib
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
Nautilus and other gnome apps using incorrect umask for new directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
34 matches
Mail list logo
