Re: [Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-11 Thread John Vivirito
On 12/09/2008 08:53 AM, Saša Bodiroža wrote: Hello, On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Pander wrote: See screenshot to what kind of icons I'm referring to. Probably its more a generic Mozilla addon packaging checklist item. Some people tell me that I need help, some people can fuck off and go

Re: [Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-09 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Pander wrote: See screenshot to what kind of icons I'm referring to. Probably its more a generic Mozilla addon packaging checklist item. Some people tell me that I need help, some people can fuck off and go to hell. -- Cypress Hill ** Attachment

[Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-08 Thread John Vivirito
Updated description to use Chatzilla instead of firefox-* ** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] firefox-chatzilla + [needs-packaging] Chatzilla -- [needs-packaging] Chatzilla https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-08 Thread Pander
Please make sure the icon becomes visible in the Tool menu when this addon is installed in Firefox. Foxmarks is a good example of this, many addons lack this feature. Perhaps this is an upstream requirement, also for all other Mozilla addons. -- [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

Re: [Bug 243466] Re: [needs-packaging] Chatzilla

2008-12-08 Thread John Vivirito
On 12/08/2008 10:44 AM, Pander wrote: Please make sure the icon becomes visible in the Tool menu when this addon is installed in Firefox. Foxmarks is a good example of this, many addons lack this feature. Perhaps this is an upstream requirement, also for all other Mozilla addons. As an