dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
unmanagable environment.
If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq with a
wrapper that uses your configuration file.
I'm curious what sort
dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
--
add option to start dnsmasq with a custom configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247583
You received this bug notification because you are a
dnsmasq started by libvirtd contains "--conf-file=" argument which
prevents dnsmasq to read its default config file in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
It is simple and clean to remove this argument to allow modification of
dnsmasq behavior. In my own setting, I need dnsmasq to send a DNS domain
to the guests to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Will never ever happen. :) By design. Allowing you to pass arbitrary
> options to kvm, iptables and/or dnsmasq would result in an unknown and
> unmanagable environment.
>
> If you really, truly want this, you should replace dnsmasq wi
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
Hi Mario,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
If you have a bridge and you're using it for your guest network libvirt
should n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:34:37PM -, Mario Manno wrote:
> I already have a bridge, a dhcp server and a dns cache. Do I really have
> to dpkg-divert the dnsmasq binary to stop libvirtd from starting it?
Um.. No? You can just disable the dhcp server. Try this:
$ virsh net-dumpxml default > def
36 matches
Mail list logo
