[Bug 248965] Re: u-n does not process a file dropped in /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d until dpkg-run-stamp was written

2009-07-14 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for this additional information. There is nothing that prevents third parties from using it, its just that the current main use-case is stuff that is happening during package installation. The dpkg-run-stamp file is automatcially updated when apt is finished so in practise this should

[Bug 248965] Re: u-n does not process a file dropped in /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d until dpkg-run-stamp was written

2009-03-16 Thread Pablo Martí
We thought that /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d was the place where applications that wanted to use the update-notifier infrastructure should drop a file. Our application required an specific action to be run by the user upon upgrade, thus we dropped a file mimicking how the firefox package does

[Bug 248965] Re: u-n does not process a file dropped in /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d until dpkg-run-stamp was written

2009-03-12 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. Given that the files installed there are from packages (or the system is designed for that) having the touch requirement sounds not too bad to me. This ensures that e.g. firefox-restart notifciation are not shown until he install is actually finished. Or what is your

[Bug 248965] Re: u-n does not process a file dropped in /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d until dpkg-run-stamp was written

2008-09-04 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: update-notifier Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Triaged -- u-n does not process a file dropped in /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d until dpkg-run-stamp was written https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248965 You received this bug notification because you are a