[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2019-06-12 Thread jwater7
One larger side effect of not supporting more fds is that the use of multi volume info script in tar fails (as in their example) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249620 Title: dash

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2014-07-08 Thread NickW
Just observed this behaviour myself, although I had to google to learn the cause. So I would also request that the error message could be more informative than this: exec: 200: not found N -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2014-07-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249620 Title: dash

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2011-09-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dash (Debian) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249620 Title: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors To manage notifications

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2010-12-11 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
Upstream seems to have said no fix is planned: http://www.mail- archive.com/d...@vger.kernel.org/msg00200.html Furthermore, I have tried this command in various other shells and it does not work in zsh, ksh93 and mksh either. (ksh93 has a different, incompatible way to use fds greater than 9.)

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2010-12-07 Thread Brian Murray
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #590920 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590920 ** Also affects: dash (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590920 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags added: udd-find -- You received this bug

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2010-12-07 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dash (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249620 Title: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2010-08-22 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
You may want this, but allowing only fd 0-9 is not a POSIX violation. XCU 2.7 Redirection says the maximum fd for redirection is implementation-defined and must be at least 9. This is sufficient for most applications. -- dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

[Bug 249620] Re: dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors

2009-06-18 Thread Jamie Lokier
Confirmed. This doesn't work either: exec 200file Neither does the sample code given in the flock man page: ( flock -s 200 # ... commands executed under lock ... ) 200/var/lock/mylockfile -- dash does not support multi-digit file descriptors