[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
sun-java5 (1.5.0-16-0ubuntu0.6.06.1) dapper-updates; urgency=low * No-change upload to -updates, after passed verification. (LP: #255011) -- Martin Pitt Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:17:41 + sun-java5 (1.5.0-16-0ubuntu0.6.06) dapper-proposed; urgency=low * CVE's addressed in this upstream rele

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Copied to hardy-updates. ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
As for the dapper update, I removed it since it was sitting in dapper- proposed for half a year without a bug # reference, thus it fell victim to my SRU cleanup. I'll upload a no-change upload to -updates. -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2009-01-20 Thread Andreas Wenning
Could this be marked as verification-done; or should more tests be performed? -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-11-27 Thread Andreas Wenning
@pitti Do you want me to perform any more validation-testing on this? -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-11-11 Thread Andreas Wenning
dapper-proposed packages looks good as well. Tested: - stand-alone applications - applets in firefox -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-11-11 Thread Andreas Wenning
hardy-proposed package confirmed. The following has been tested: - stand-alone application - applet in firefox3 - applet in firefox2 - applet in konqueror -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-11-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Intrepid has 1.5.0-16, so does Jaunty. Should this package be removed from Jaunty? -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bu

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-11-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Also, anyone who could give the dapper/hardy-proposed versions a quick test to check that they still by and large work? -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
this bug was targeted to intrepid, though - if you want to track this bug for jaunty, this should be 'wontfix' now for intrepid. ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bu

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-10-15 Thread Matthias Klose
keeping it open, so I know I have to revisit it / remove the package from jaunty after the next (1.5.0-17) release. -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-10-14 Thread Colin Watson
Should this bug still be open against Intrepid? sun-java5 1.5.0-16-3 seems to fix this, although it doesn't refer to this bug report. -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
keep it for intrepid; then remove it in jaunty. End of Service life means we won't get any updates anymore, and leave our users without fixes for the time they run the release. -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-19 Thread Max Bowsher
I've just realized an additional point. Owing to evolution of interfaces that are included in the JDK, such as JDBC, there are projects such as Hibernate which *cannot* be compiled with JDK 6, and must use JDK 5 (because JDK 6 added methods to interfaces). So, yes, there's significant benefit in re

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-18 Thread Max Bowsher
Java developers usually have to use the earliest JDK version with which they want their product to remain compatible with, to verify that compatibility. As such, there's certainly a large group of people who would find it very useful for Java 5 to remain in Intrepid and beyond, who will need to pur

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-18 Thread Alex Mayorga Adame
Matthias, I believe that's entirely up to you as the maintainer. Java 5 would reach "End of Service Life" (EOSL) on October 30, 2009 and Sun already encourages to "Migrate to the latest Java SE release" http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp so in theory this should make it into Intre

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-07 Thread Martin Pitt
For the intrepid task, do we actually need to keep sun-java5, and thus should update it here as well, or just drop the package entirely? ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) Status: New => Triaged -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted into dapper-proposed as well. ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Dapper) Status: New => Fix Committed -- sru request for sun-java5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-n

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
for dapper-proposed: sun-java5 (1.5.0-16-0ubuntu0.6.06) dapper-proposed; urgency=low * CVE's addressed in this upstream release: CVE-2008-3115, CVE-2008-3114, CVE-2008-3113, CVE-2008-3112, CVE-2008-3111, CVE-2008-3110, CVE-2008-3109, CVE-2008-3108, CVE-2008-3107, CVE-2008-3106

[Bug 255011] Re: sru request for sun-java5

2008-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
* New upstream bug fix release. LP: #255011. - Including security related changes. CVE-2008-3115, CVE-2008-3114, CVE-2008-3113, CVE-2008-3112, CVE-2008-3111, CVE-2008-3110, CVE-2008-3109, CVE-2008-3108, CVE-2008-3107, CVE-2008-3106, CVE-2008-3105, CVE-2008-3104, CVE-2