But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
I have to same problem.
Server with Xeon X3320 (Quad Core)
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3320 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 7
cpu MHz : 2493.804
cache size
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Please attach the output of xm dmesg and xm info.
Thanks
chuck
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
xm dmesg
** Attachment added: "xm-dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165384/xm-dmesg
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
xm info
** Attachment added: "xm-info"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17165386/xm-info
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
I'm also got the same bug. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo
--
bu...@dev-xen:~$ uname -a
Linux dev-xen 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 20:14:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bu...@dev-xen:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0<--- Kalo di kernel XEN, processor ini 0 semua
dbawah
ven
** Changed in: xen-3.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
But Companies depend on LTS (now it's Hardy). Therefore as Hardy doesn't
have it, we should fix ASAP.
Besides, most of the code is not accepted on 2.6.30 yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/325188/
Cheers,
Pereira
--
All processors in /proc/cpuinfo have ID 0 (zero)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2627
60 matches
Mail list logo