This bug is obsoleted, it no longer affects to the current supported
Ubuntu versions.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
the bi-directional dependencies between sun-java6-plugin and firefox
should be removed. I want to use the latest firefox 3.6 and whenever I
try to remove the installed firefox 3.5 it wants to remove the plugin as
well. This makes no sense as firefox 3.6 works well with the plugin.
--
Review
Attached is a debdiff, that changes the dependency into a suggestion. I cut
down the list of browsers to some more widely used.
If this gets accepted, the sun-java5-plugin should also be updated.
** Attachment added: debdiff, to change the browser dependencies into
suggestions
In my opinion the browsers should be listed as suggestions. That's the way it's
handled in the flashplugin.
The Java plugin doesn't depend on any browser and listing all here won't scale.
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you
The dependencies also pose an issue when trying to install the Firefox
3.5 beta, without having Firefox 3.0 installed, and then wanting the
Java plugin installed.
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I have just had this problem with an auto update to sun java in the past
few days. The plugin still lists ff as a required package and hence was
trying to install it. I seem to have got round it by adding the repos
that eaglescreen lists above. I don't understand why this package has
just appeared
Luis, you only need sun-java6-jre, the plugin is not necessary for
konqueror.
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks for the tips. I'm installing on an Asus eeepc and disk space
really matters...
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm runing kubuntu intrepid and when I try to install the package apt-
get tells me that it is going to install all of the following:
app-install-data apturl firefox firefox-3.0 firefox-3.0-branding gnome-
app-install gnome-icon-theme libgnome2-canvas-perl libgnome2-perl
libgnome2-vfs-perl
Yes Luis, becouse this I reported this bug.
If you want you can install sun-java packages from my ppa repository by the
momment, which have this issue fixed by adding Konqueror to dependence list.
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/eaglescreen/ubuntu intrepid main
deb-src
in my machine, www-browser points to /usr/bin/w3m which is a text based
browser. wouldn't there be a need to check if www-browser actually
supports java ?
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
See also Bug #269136
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: sun-java6-plugin
sun-java6-plugin 6-07-4ubuntu2.
Depens on:
firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | mozilla-firefox | iceape-browser |
mozilla-browser | epiphany-gecko | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon
| midbrowser | xulrunner
-
From IRC:
[09:07:24] Riddell it should depend on www-browser not a horrible long list
of browsers
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
how does www-browser make sure that the plugin works and is installed?
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Do the listed browsers do that somehow?
If so it probably makes sense to list them individually (but if listed
individually, one should at least all of them). Otherwise it just as reasonable
to have $www-borwser and still can install the plugin without getting another
$www-browser (while in
I have made a patch fixing this issue.
I already have compiled the binary .deb packages for testing and seems to works
OK.
You can apply the patch over the package source code with patch -p1
patch.debdiff in the root of package source code folder.
** Attachment added: Patch in debdiff format.
Also firefox-3.0 shuld be added to dependence list.
--
Review dependences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
