** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
This bug was fixed in the package openafs - 1.4.7.dfsg1-6
---
openafs (1.4.7.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply upstream patch to free /proc entries in the correct order.
Thanks, Marc Dionne. (Closes: #493914)
* Apply upstream deltas to support 2.6.27 kernels and to stop
** Summary changed:
- openafs-modules-source 1.4.6 fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h removed
+ openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
** Description changed:
In the 2.6.27 kernel,
Actually, at first glance OpenAFS is not using at all
in kernels >= 2.6.16. For example, "src/rx/LINUX/rx_kmutex.h" has this
snippet:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
#include
#else
#include
#endif
typedef struct afs_kmutex {
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)
fwyzard, is that patch from upstream, or have you considered sending
that patch upstream to OpenAFS?
>From my understanding, Bjorn's debdiff combines (accepted and committed)
patches from the upstream bug tracker, so eventually the patch can be
removed once upstream makes a release with said code
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/openafs
--
openafs-modules-source fails to build with 2.6.27-2 kernel in intrepid:
asm/semaphore.h replaced with linux/semaphore.h
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
30 matches
Mail list logo
