[Bug 268267] Re: Explain the implications of suggested tweaks

2011-11-10 Thread Christoph Buchner
I agree, this needs more information. On one machine I have ~15 bad tunables, but I don't dare to switch on most of them, because I have no idea about the (negative) consequences, what I could break (or if the changes are harmless), if they revert on boot, what kind of power savings they bring

[Bug 268267] Re: Explain the implications of suggested tweaks

2010-07-17 Thread Virgil Brummond
I agree with the "undo" ability, though I believe most tweaks are not permanent and revert on reboot. Also, I think it would be nice if we had a Power Initive where us as a community puts forward a bit of effort and logs into improving power management. This would be good for open source as a whole

[Bug 268267] Re: Explain the implications of suggested tweaks

2008-09-09 Thread Scott Wegner
Although perhaps beyond the scope of the utility, it may also be useful to have a history of actions taken, and also the option to "undo" a given tweak. This would require backing-up the previous value as well. -- Explain the implications of suggested tweaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26826

[Bug 268267] Re: Explain the implications of suggested tweaks

2008-09-09 Thread Jonathan Ben-Joseph
PowerTop can be a little more clear on what drawbacks, if any, there are is in a given action. ** Changed in: powertop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Explain the implications of suggested tweaks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268267 You received this bug notification because you ar