Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Statu
Which precise version (8.04 ? 8.10) have you upgraded to ? smbfs has
been replaced by cifs, so please try to mount your share with cifs
instead and report success/failure.
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug no
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important
for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn
more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?
This will help us to find and resolve the problem.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepacka
the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
** Changed in: ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
Status: Incomplete => New
--
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x
Thierry Carrez :
cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?
I don't know how to be more "precise" then what I already said: "cat
/proc/
A few notes:
* CIFS does not have fmask/dmask options (that's for -t fat). It uses file_mode
and dir_mode. Try those to see if you get better results
* file_mode and dir_mode are only used if CIFS does not negociate CIFS Unix
extensions with the server. So if it still returns drwxrwxrwx and -rwxr
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?
update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
> Sourcepackagename: gvfs => None
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> mount smbfs not
60 matches
Mail list logo
