ubufox part is fixed. not sure if we really want abrowser to _not_
display the Know your Rights... notification. added task for
firefox-3.0 accordingly again.
ubufox (0.6~b1-0ubuntu3) intrepid; urgency=low
(cherry-pick rev 112 from lp:ubufox)
* fix LP: #269656 - AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS
decision needed for beta. milestoning.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Triaged
Target: None = ubuntu-8.10-beta
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
abrowser shouldn't display
fix committed to firefox-3.0.head branch (rev342)
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I think it would be a good idea to remove the Know your rights part.
Users switching from the firefox branding may be doing so with an
expectation that they will not have Mozilla popups appearing anymore
(even though this is much better than the previous situation). Most of
the paragraphs in
This bug was fixed in the package firefox-3.0 - 3.0.2+build6+nobinonly-
0ubuntu2
---
firefox-3.0 (3.0.2+build6+nobinonly-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low
* fix LP: #273907 - abrowser does not start: :$pkglibdir/abrowser link
missing; we introduce the proper link in the
Why is there a browser called abrowser there any more, since Mozilla
does not force us any more to show the EULA?
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I believe the EULA is still present in the latest Ubuntu version of
Firefox. Even if it were removed, many users would prefer an unbranded
browser since Firefox contains non-free artwork.
This bug is about the EULA in abrowser, so discussion about the
inclusion of abrowser itself is not relevant
this bug needs to be resolved in ubufox. reassigning.
For now lets target the fix for beta. anything before is too early -
especially when considering that there are still too many uncertain
variables in this equation. One dependency of this bug is clearly bug
269656 which deals with the general
That is pretty funny.
Abrowser was created because Firefox showed EULA, so it was created, not to
show EULA. Yet it does...
Oh the irony...
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
lol fail
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
You can't be serious.
If you love EULAs, use the branded firefox browser (bug #269656). The
unbranded abrowser is not Mozilla's trademark, and it is a bug to
display the EULA there.
This bug has already been triaged, and so further discussion is not
necessary. We're just waiting on a fix.
--
Disagree.
Every good browser should show an EULA. Good developers first write the EULA,
only after hack a software around it.
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
Assignee: (unassigned) = Alexander Sack (asac)
Status: New = Triaged
--
abrowser shouldn't display the EULA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
13 matches
Mail list logo
